Schools Should I Take AP Physics 1 to Reaffirm My Understanding or Skip to AP Physics 2?

AI Thread Summary
A high school junior seeks advice on whether to take AP Physics 1 after completing honors physics, noting that AP Physics B has been split into two courses. The student expresses concern that AP Physics 1 may cover material already learned in honors physics. The discussion emphasizes the importance of consulting with a school counselor and teachers to assess the curriculum differences and determine the best course of action. The community suggests that personal experience with the content taught in previous classes is crucial for making an informed decision.
Gamenets
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey PF, I'm new to the forums and I want to ask you for some guidance. I'm currently in my junior year of high school and took honors physics last semester. I WAS planing on taking AP Physics B in my senior year, so I have a fair understanding of physics before going to college. But sadly AP Physics B is being split into two different courses for the next academic year. The thing is AP Physics 1 seems to cover a lot of things my honors class already covered. So should i just skip AP physics 1 or take it to reaffirming my basic understanding of Newtonian physics? and if there is a AP physics teacher (I doubt it) would you please recommend what I should do?

P.S. Thank for the help and replies I really don't mean to bother you guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should ask your counselor and the teachers of those classes. We don't know what you were taught in previous classes nor what will be taught in this one.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Back
Top