Should the quark propagator vanish because of confinement?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the nature of the quark propagator in the context of confinement in quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Participants explore the implications of confinement on the existence of colored states and the derivation of the quark propagator, considering both theoretical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern that the quark propagator should vanish due to confinement, as all energy eigenstates must be color singlets, suggesting that terms involving colored states would be zero.
  • Another participant clarifies that confinement involves more than just color neutrality, indicating that color charges cannot be separated, which complicates the understanding of the quark propagator.
  • A third participant questions how the absence of colored eigenstates would not lead to the vanishing of the quark propagator, seeking clarification on the implications of confinement.
  • A later reply discusses the dependence of the quark propagator on the definition of the vacuum state and the gauge-dependence of the propagator, noting that confinement implies the propagator must vanish in a non-perturbative sense.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of confinement for the quark propagator, with no consensus reached on how to reconcile the existence of the propagator with the constraints imposed by confinement.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of defining the vacuum state and the gauge-dependence of the quark propagator, as well as the unresolved nature of confinement's implications for colored states.

Nicolasrll
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone! Something has been bothering me lately. Consider the quark propagator:

[tex]\langle 0|\psi_a(x)\psi_a(0) |0\rangle[/tex]

For a given color a. Now let's say we insert [tex]1 = \sum |n \rangle \langle n|[/tex] between the two quark fields, where the sum is over a complete set of energy eigenstates. We then have a sum over a bunch of terms of the form [tex]\langle n|\psi_a(0)|0\rangle[/tex]

Here then is what I'm worried about: confinement, as I understand it, tells us that all energy eigenstates must be color singlets. But unless I'm mistaken, [tex]\psi_a(0)|0\rangle[/tex] is not at all a color singlet, and therefore I would expect all the terms of the form shown above to be zero. This, obviously, clashes hideously with the quark propagator used in perturbative QCD. So what am I missing?

Thank you for your insight!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Confinement is more than just color neutrality or color singulet states. Color confinement means that in addition to color neutrality color charges cannot be separated from each other.

Color neutrality can be derived from the Gauss law constraint "algebraically", whereas confinement requires for a dynamical explanation, which is still missing.
 
Right, but I'm not sure how that resolves the issue. I mean, whether we call it color neutrality or color confinement, the end result seems to be that there are no colored eigenstates, so [tex]\langle n|\psi_a(0)|0\rangle[/tex] would seem to vanish, along with the quark propagator. I don't think this can be right, so how do I get out this bind?
 
I am not sure how to derive the quark propagator in this picture. It depends on what |0> is, the (trival) Fock vacuum or the physical vacuum. In order to enforce color neutrality one has to restrict the physical states to the kernel of the Gauss law Ga(x)|phys> = 0; but this is a gauge-dependend constraint derived for A°=0. And of course the propagator itself is gauge-dependent, too.

Of course due to confinement the quark propagator (in a certain regime) needs to vanish somehow, but thus is a non-perturbative statement and cannot be derived from the perturbative vacuum.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K