Should You Differentiate A_\nu or A_\alpha in Calculus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Neitrino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    even
Neitrino
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I put my question in the attached file... could you please look at it...
it is very simple quiestion...

thank you :shy:
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't used the einstein summation notation or done tensor math but I think I know where you're going with this one.

I'll refer to the multivariate case of differentiation from here on in as it looks like you're trying to accomplish something similar.

The partial derivatives you calculated seem correct so I'm not quite sure what you want to do with it. The question I think is not specific enough but I probably don't understand why your are doing what you're trying to do.

Expand the whole thing out without use of tensor notation and give us a reason behind the problem and I'll probably have a chance of helping you.
 
You are asking whether you should differentiate A_\nu or A_\alpha aren't you? You should differentiate both. This is a product (more correctly, a sum of products) so use the product rule.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top