Show how the Boltzmann entropy is derived from the Gibbs entropy for equilibrium

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster attempts to derive the Boltzmann entropy from the Gibbs entropy for systems in equilibrium, focusing on the relationship between the probability distribution and the number of microstates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the system being in equilibrium, where all microstates have equal probability. The original poster attempts to substitute the probability distribution into the Gibbs entropy equation but encounters difficulties in the integration process. Others question the validity of certain substitutions and clarify the distinction between discrete and continuous systems.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide clarifications on the mathematical steps involved, while others express uncertainty about specific transformations and the normalization of variables. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and attempts to reconcile different aspects of the problem without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of working with continuous systems versus discrete systems, particularly regarding the definitions and roles of microstates and phase space volume in the context of the Gibbs and Boltzmann entropies.

zi-lao-lan
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show how the Boltzmann entropy is derived from the Gibbs entropy for systems in equilibrium.


Homework Equations



Gibbs entropy S= - \int \rho(p,q) (ln \rho(p,q)) dpdq
where \rho(p,q) is the probability distribution

Boltzmann entropy S= ln\Omega
where \Omega is the number of microstates in a given macrostate.


The Attempt at a Solution



1. Well, when the system is in equilibrium (ie when the Boltzmann entropy can be used) all microstates have equal probability. So this means that each microstate has a probability of 1/\Omega and the probability distribution \rho will have a constant value regardless of what p and q are.

2. I tried putting \rho=1/\Omega and subbing it into the Gibb's equation

S= - \int 1/\Omega (ln \1/\Omega) d\Omega<br /> using d\Omega since we want to add up over all the microstates and there are <br /> \Omega of them. But I can see that this won&#039;t give me the Boltzmann entropy.<br /> <br /> Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your problem is in setting dp dq = d\Omega, because with omega, you mean a fixed number, not a variable! It is clearer in this manner:

- \int \rho \ln \rho dp dq = - \int \frac{1}{\Omega} \ln \frac{1}{\Omega} dp dq = \left( - \frac{1}{\Omega} \ln \frac{1}{\Omega} \right) \int dp dq = \left( \frac{1}{\Omega} \ln \Omega \right) \Omega = \ln \Omega
 
Thanks for the reply :) But I'm still not sure how you get to the last step.

That means the the integral of dpdp = - omega, but I can't see why that is.

Is it something to do with normalising it?
 
ln(1/Ω)= ln1-lnΩ lol
 
Well, in a discrete system, omega is the number of microstates, but we're working with a continuous system here: then omega is the phase space volume, by which I mean the "volume" in (p,q)-space formed by all the available (p,q)-points. I think it's just defined that way actually.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K