Show Region of Integration for Multiple Integrals

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around how to visually represent the region of integration for repeated integrals, specifically in two dimensions. Participants explore methods of sketching the area defined by double integrals, including the use of boundaries and curves.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how to show the region of integration represented by a repeated integral, expressing confusion over existing diagrams.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on what is meant by "showing," suggesting it could involve drawing or writing formulae.
  • A later reply specifies that drawing is the intended method of representation.
  • One participant provides a description of a double integral format, explaining the roles of the limits of integration and suggesting how to sketch the region by drawing vertical lines and the curves defined by the functions.
  • Another participant mentions that indicating the area of integration can be done in various ways, such as cross-hatching, but notes there is no strict rule for representation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of visual representation in understanding regions of integration, but there is no consensus on a singular method or standard for how to draw these regions.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with the topic, and there may be assumptions about prior knowledge of double integrals and their graphical representations that are not explicitly stated.

Brewer
Messages
203
Reaction score
0
How do I go about showing the region of integration represented by a repeated integral? (Just for 2 dimensional functions)

All the diagrams I've seen show the area under the graph, but with like 2 bars across it. I don't understand what all this represents and my poor quality notes are of absolutely no help whatsoever.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
'Showing' in what sense? Drawing on paper? Writing it as formulae in the integral sign?
 
Sorry, yes drawing.

Sketching would probably have been a better way of phrasing it.
 
A double integral must look something like this:
[tex]\int_{x=a}^b\int_{y=f(x)}^{g(x)} u(x,y)dy dx[/itex]<br /> That is, the limits on the outer integral <b>must</b> be numbers, not functions or x or y, and the limits on the inner integral must be functions of the "outer" variable (x in this case because the "outer" integral is with respect to x), not the "inner" variable (y in this case).<br /> <br /> The limits of integration tell you "x can take on all values between a and b and <b>for each x</b> y goes from f(x) up to g(x)". Draw two vertical lines at x= a and x= b to show that boundary. Now draw the graphs of y= f(x) and y= g(x). The region bounded by those 4 lines/curves is the area of integration. (In many problems, it happens that the two curves intersect precisely at x= a and/or x= b.)[/tex]
 
Well, you draw it and indicate however you want which part of the diagram is the bit you're integrating over. Often cross hatching is the preferred way but there really is no golden rule.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K