Show that 1/2mv^2 = 3/2kT for a star cluster

  • Thread starter Thread starter warfreak131
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Star
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around demonstrating the relationship T = m < v^2(x) > / (3k) for a stellar system, where stars are assumed to have equal mass and their velocities are averaged. Participants express confusion about how to approach the problem, particularly in justifying the assumption that stars behave like particles in a gas. There is a suggestion to clarify the assumptions before applying the equations. The conversation highlights the challenge of interpreting the teacher's expectations and the need for a solid understanding of the underlying physics. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of justifying the behavior of stars in a cluster as analogous to gas particles.
warfreak131
Messages
186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Demonstrate that the temperature applicable to a stellar system
is
T = m < v2 (x) >
...3k
where it is assumed that the stars have equal mass m, v(x) is the
velocity of a star relative to the center-of-mass, and <> represents
an average.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know how to approach this problem. The only thing I could guess is that the spherically symmetric stars can be considered the particles of a system, so it's just a much larger system, but the physics is the same overall.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't it something like: Assume the stars move about with a mean thermal energy, which is their KE. So KE = 1/2mv^2 = (3/2)KT
Then mv^2 = 3kT => T = mv^2/3k?
 
Physics Enemy said:
Isn't it something like: Assume the stars move about with a mean thermal energy, which is their KE. So KE = 1/2mv^2 = (3/2)KT
Then mv^2 = 3kT => T = mv^2/3k?

I emailed him about it, citing this argument, and he said that we have to demonstrate it for a cluster of stars, not particles.
 
warfreak131 said:
I emailed him about it, citing this argument, and he said that we have to demonstrate it for a cluster of stars, not particles.
But isn't the idea that they are behaving like particles in a gas?
 
Physics Enemy said:
But isn't the idea that they are behaving like particles in a gas?

tell that to him, not me :P

i don't know what the hell he wants us to do
 
warfreak131 said:
tell that to him, not me :P

i don't know what the hell he wants us to do
I think he wants you to justify why they behave like particles in a gas, before you write down the equations. Perhaps Wiki it? I think you need to explain the assumptions.

Hey, would you mind checking my thread? It's a basic numeracy one lol.
 
thats what i was thinking, but then again, you don't know my teacher, or how horrible he is.

and i checked your numeracy question, and I am not quite sure what its asking for :P sorry

i don't want to hijack my own thread and turn it into another question, so i won't discuss it here
 
Back
Top