Show that a function is increasing

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster is seeking assistance in proving that the function f(x) = 9x^2 + 3x is strictly increasing on the interval (0, 10]. The discussion revolves around the properties of quadratic functions and their behavior over specified intervals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss evaluating the difference f(v) - f(u) for u < v within the interval and question the implications of its sign. Some suggest using the first derivative to analyze the function's behavior, while others explore alternative methods without derivatives.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided hints and suggestions for approaching the proof, including factoring the expression for f(v) - f(u) and interpreting the implications of the signs involved. There is an ongoing exploration of reasoning and methods, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion is occurring in a pre-calculus context, which may limit the use of certain mathematical tools like derivatives.

Parthalan
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm in need of some help putting together this proof. I'm not sure if it's just harder than it looks, or I need to spend more time learning how to put them together.

Homework Statement


Show that [itex]f(x) = 9x^2 + 3x[/itex] is strictly increasing on the interval [itex](0, 10][/itex]

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


I realize there are various arguments involving the turning point of a quadratic equation, but I don't think this is the type of answer that they're looking for.

Let [itex]u < v[/itex] be two elements of the interval [itex](0, 10][/itex]. Then from [itex]f(u) < f(v)[/itex] we obtain:
[tex]9u^2 + 3u < 9v^2 + 3v[/tex],
[tex]9u^2 + 3u - 9v^2 + 3v < 0[/tex]

From here, I think I need to get to [itex]u < v[/itex], but I can't see how to do it.

Thanks for any help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What sign does f(v)-f(u) have?
 
One thing you can do is evaluate the first derivative of the function on that specified interval.
Do you know how can you interpret the sign of the derivative of a function over a specified interval on how the function itself is behaving on that interval?
 
The sign must be [itex]f(v) - f(u) > 0[/itex], otherwise [itex]f(v) < f(u)[/itex].

Also, thanks for the suggestion about using the derivative, but I'm wondering if this can be done without.

Now for another go.

Let [itex]u < v[/itex] be in the interval [itex](0, 10][/itex]. Suppose that [itex]f(v) > f(u)[/itex]. Then:
[tex]f(v) - f(u) < 0[/tex]
[tex]9v^2 + 3v - 9u^2 + 3u < 0[/tex]
Which can only be true for [itex]u > v[/itex], hence, a contradiction.

Is that it, or did I miss a step?

Thanks for your help.
 
Last edited:
Your reasoning is circular. If you really want to show its increasing without derivatives show f(v)-f(u) is positive by factoring the expression for it. Hint: it's divisible by (v-u). Correct the sign on the 3u term first.
 
Last edited:
Parthalan - read carfully what Dick is suggesting.

As an added hint start of your reasoning like this

Let u, v be two elelements in the interval (0,10] with u<v.

f(v)-f(u) = ...

and then as Dick says use the information you have to show this must be >0
 
I'm sure I have you all banging your head against a wall by now.

I got this far:

Let [itex]f(x) = 9x^2 + 3x[/itex] and [itex]u, v \in (0, 10][/itex], where [itex]u < v[/itex]. If the function is strictly increasing, then [itex]f(u) < f(v)[/itex]. From this, we determine:
[tex]f(v) - f(u) = (9v^2 + 3v) - (9u^2 + 3u)[/tex]
[tex]= 9v^2 + 3v - 9u^2 - 3u[/tex]
[tex]= (-3u + 3v)(1 + 3u + 3v)[/tex]
[tex]= -3(u - v)(1 + 3u + 3v)[/tex]
Since [itex]u < v[/itex], then [itex]u - v[/itex] must be negative. Since the product of two negatives is always a positive, and [itex](1 + 3u + 3v)[/itex] will also be positive, then [itex]f(v) - f(u)[/itex] must be positive, and therefore, [itex]f(u) < f(v)[/itex].
QED.

Is that right, or am I still going in circles?

Many thanks to the people who have helped.
 
Last edited:
:rolleyes: Is it even necessary to write so much about this? If [tex]0< x_{1} < x_{2}[/tex]

[tex]3x_{1} < 3x_{2}[/itex] and [tex]9{x_{1}}^2 < 9{x_{2}}^2[/tex] . Therefore<br /> <br /> [tex]9{x_{1}}^2 + 3x_{1} < 9{x_{2}}^2 + 3x_{2}[/tex]. We're done here.[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Thanks!

That was what I tried to do in the first place, but I forgot to factor it first, and ended up trying to show that it was increasing because the difference between [itex]f(x_2)[/itex] and [itex]f(x_1)[/itex] was positive. Changing the inequality directly seems to be the easier way (not as easy as using the derivative, but unfortunately, it's a course that comes before calculus).
 
Last edited:
  • #10
ziad1985 said:
One thing you can do is evaluate the first derivative of the function on that specified interval.
Do you know how can you interpret the sign of the derivative of a function over a specified interval on how the function itself is behaving on that interval?

Don't forget, this is the pre-calculus section! :-p
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K