Show that ln(x) < sqrt(x) for x>0

  • Thread starter Thread starter chipotleaway
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves demonstrating the inequality ln(x) < √(x) for x > 0, which falls under the subject area of calculus, specifically focusing on the comparison of functions and their derivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of derivatives to compare the growth rates of ln(x) and √(x). Questions are raised about the implications of derivative comparisons and the need for a starting point for arguments. There is also consideration of the behavior of the functions in the interval (0, 4) and the significance of their monotonicity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring various approaches to establish the inequality. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to prove specific conditions at x=4 and to consider the behavior of the functions in the interval from 0 to 4. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly concerning the role of derivatives.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that both functions are monotonically increasing and discuss the limit behavior as x approaches 0. There is mention of the need to show the inequality holds in the interval (0, 4), which is considered trivial by some, while others express the need for further justification.

chipotleaway
Messages
174
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that ln(x) < √(x) for x>0

The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea where to start! I saw an older thread on here that asked the same question and one suggestion was to take derivatives of both functions and show that the derivative of the RHS would be larger as approaches infinity but how does this show that √(x) is greater for lower values of x?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To answer your last question - what does the derivative tell you?
If that is bigger - what does it mean?
If it were smaller - what would happen?
 
You also need to figure out where the derivative of log(x) starts to be greater than the derivative of sqrt(x). You are going to need a starting point for your argument.
 
Simon Bridge said:
To answer your last question - what does the derivative tell you?
If that is bigger - what does it mean?
If it were smaller - what would happen?

The rate of change, so the function with the larger derivative would increase faster...I just wasn't sure using that argument alone would be enough to say that because of that, the function is larger than the other for all x>0.

I found that the derivatives are equal at x=4 and from there, it looks like the derivative of log(x) is less than the derivtaive of √(x). How would I show that this though? Do I just solve assume
1/2√(x) > 1/x and solve for x?
 
Hello ChipotleAway,

Almost there!

Now that you know that at [itex]x=4[/itex] the derivates are equal, you have two more steps:

  • Prove that at [itex]x=4[/itex], [itex]\sqrt {x} > \ln {x}[/itex]
  • Prove that [itex]\forall x > 4[/itex], [itex]\frac{1}{x} < \frac{1}{2\sqrt {x}}[/itex]

J.
 
jfgobin said:
Hello ChipotleAway,

Almost there!

Now that you know that at [itex]x=4[/itex] the derivates are equal, you have two more steps:

  • Prove that at [itex]x=4[/itex], [itex]\sqrt {x} > \ln {x}[/itex]
  • Prove that [itex]\forall x > 4[/itex], [itex]\frac{1}{x} < \frac{1}{2\sqrt {x}}[/itex]

J.

Thanks, I'll see if I can show that! Also, wouldn't I need to somehow show that √(x) > log(x) for x between 0 and 4 as well?
 
chipotleaway said:
Thanks, I'll see if I can show that! Also, wouldn't I need to somehow show that √(x) > log(x) for x between 0 and 4 as well?

The case where x is between 0 and 4 is considered trivial.

Both ##\sqrt{x}## and ##\ln(x)## are monotonically increasing. Because ##\displaystyle \lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\ln(x)<\sqrt{0}## and ##\ln(4)<\sqrt{4}##, we know that ##\ln(x)<\sqrt{x}## from 0 to 4.
 
Mandelbroth said:
Both ##\sqrt{x}## and ##\ln(x)## are monotonically increasing. Because ##\displaystyle \lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\ln(x)<\sqrt{0}## and ##\ln(4)<\sqrt{4}##, we know that ##\ln(x)<\sqrt{x}## from 0 to 4.
That is not sufficient. There are functions which satisfy all conditions you mentioned, but violate the inequality to be shown.

Instead, you can use the derivatives here as well: From 0 to 4, the derivative of ln(x) is larger than the derivative of sqrt(x)...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K