Show that Momentum Operator is Hermitian: Q&A

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that the momentum operator is Hermitian within the context of quantum mechanics. The original poster seeks clarification on specific steps in the proof, particularly regarding the behavior of wave functions at long distances and the application of a final equation from a referenced source.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions why the wave function approaches zero for confined particles and seeks understanding of the last step in the proof. Other participants inquire about the definition of Hermitian operators and suggest looking into textbook definitions related to inner products.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring definitions and clarifying concepts related to Hermitian operators. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to refer to textbook explanations, but no consensus or resolution has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the definitions and properties of Hermitian operators, with some uncertainty about the specific mathematical implications in the context of the momentum operator.

krootox217
Messages
51
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Hi, my task is to show that the momentum operator is hermitian.

I found a link, which shows how to solve the problem:

http://www.colby.edu/chemistry/PChem/notes/MomentumHermitian.pdf

But there are two steps that I don't understand:

1. Why does the wave function approach zero for long distances (for a confined particle)? Can someone explain me this?

2. I don't understand the last step. I got
xMHR6K1.png


And now i don't know how to use the last equation on the paper to show that it is the same.

Can someone help me?

Homework Equations


See above

The Attempt at a Solution


See above[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the definition of hermitian?
 
I know what a hermitian matrix is. But here I'm not sure. I guess that the operator is the same as the complex conjugate of the operator?
 
You should start there then. There's no need to guess. The definition should be explained on your textbook or notes. You want to figure out specifically what it means when you say an operator is the same as its complex conjugate. It's probably explained in terms of inner products.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K