Show that Polynomials p0 to pn Form Basis of F[t] ≤ n

  • Thread starter Thread starter e.gedge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis
e.gedge
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Quick a easy question i need help with, so thanks to anyone who will try it out..

Show that the polynomials p0= 1 + x + x2+ x3...+ xn, p1= x + x2+ x3... +xn, p2= x2 + x3 +...+ xn, ... pn=xn form a basis of F[t] less than or equal to n

Thanks!
xo
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a problem like this it is best to use the definition. A "basis" for a vector space is a set of vectors that (1) span the space and (2) are independent.

Now look at the definitions of "span" and "independent".
To span the space means that every vector in the space can be written as a linear combinations in the set. Any vector in this space is a polynomal of degree less than or equal to n: any such vector can be written f(x)= \alpha_nx^n+ \alpha_{n-1}x^{n-1}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ \alpha_1 x+ \alpha_0. Can you find numbers a_0, a_1, \cdot\cdot\cdot, a_n so that a_0(1 + x + x^2+ x^3+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ x^n)+ a_1(x+ x^2+ x^3+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ x^n)+\cdot\cdot\cdot + a_n(x^n)= \alpha_nx^n+ \alpha_{n-1}x^{n-1}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ \alpha_1 x+ \alpha_0?<br /> <br /> "Independent" means that the only linear combination of the vectors that equals the 0 vector is the "trivial" combination with all coefficients equal to 0. Suppose<br /> a_0(1 + x + x^2+ x^3+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ x^n)+ a_1(x+ x^2+ x^3+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ x^n)+\cdot\cdot\cdot + a_n(x^n)= 0 for all x. Can you prove that all the "a"s must be 0?
 
Uhh... I am pretty sure that i ca do the span part, but i still am unsure as to how to go about proving that all a's must equal 0
 
oh, nevermind, i got it now. Thanks a ton for the help!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top