Show that the series is convergent

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the convergence of the series Ʃ (-1)(n-1)/ √(n+3) from n = 1 to infinity, and finding the number of terms required to achieve a specific error margin in the sum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find the convergence by taking the derivative and setting up an inequality related to the terms of the series. Some participants suggest using the Alternating Series Test instead, questioning the necessity of derivatives.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different methods to analyze the series. There is a suggestion to apply the Alternating Series Test, and some uncertainty exists regarding the number of terms needed for the desired accuracy. The conversation reflects differing interpretations of the series' behavior and convergence criteria.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of an error margin of less than 0.001, and participants are discussing the implications of the series being alternating and the behavior of its terms.

knv
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
1. Show that the series is convergent and then find how many terms we need to add in order to find the sum with an error less than .001

Ʃ (-1)(n-1)/ √(n+3)

from n = 1---> infinity




2. I took the derivative.



3. f(x) = (x+3)-1/2
f'(x) = -1/2 (x+3)-3/2

Then I set up the following

Absolute value (1/(n+1+3)) < .001

n+4 > (1/.001)2

Got 999,997 for the answer. not sure what I am doing wrong. Help!

 
Physics news on Phys.org


There really is no need to be taking derivatives here. You should try to apply the Alternating Series Test. If you don't know what that is, you can find it on Wikipedia. The page has all of your answers.
 


would it be 999,998 terms ?
 


knv said:
would it be 999,998 terms ?
How did you get that?

The absolute value of the 999,997th term is indeed 0.001 .

But the series is alternating and the absolute value of subsequent terms if decreasing. If we let Sk represent the kth partial sum, then I would expect the series to converge to a value very close to midway between Sk and Sk+1, for large k.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K