Show these wavelengths are consistent with Rydberg formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around demonstrating that specific wavelengths emitted by a hot gas align with the Balmer series for hydrogen-like atoms using the Rydberg formula. The participant rearranged the formula to isolate the nuclear charge (Z) and employed trial and error to find Z=6 for the given wavelengths. They tested various principal quantum numbers (n) and confirmed that all wavelengths corresponded to Z=6. However, there is uncertainty about whether this method sufficiently proves consistency with the Balmer series. The conversation highlights the need for a more systematic approach to validate the findings.
Kara386
Messages
204
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


These wavelengths are emitted by a hot gas:
18.226, 13.501, 12.054 (in nanometres)

Show that they are consistent with the Balmer series for a hydrogen-like atom.
Which element do they correspond to?

Homework Equations


Rearranged Rydberg formula for hydrogen-like atoms:
##Z^2 = \frac{hc}{\lambda R}(\frac{1}{n^2}-\frac{1}{4})^{-1}##

The Attempt at a Solution


Z is nuclear charge, that's really what I need to find to identify the element, so I rearranged the Rydberg formula to get the above expression.

The only way I can think of to solve this is by trial and error. So I tried subbing in ##n=3## and the first wavelength, and found that that corresponded to ##Z=6##, then ##n=4## and ##n=5## with the next two wavelengths respectively also gave ##Z=6##. But I'm not sure that really satisfies the condition 'show that they are consistent', because I've just guessed n and it happened to work. Is there a better way to solve this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your approach is good.
 
  • Like
Likes Kara386
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top