Showing an analytic function is identically zero

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dunkle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Zero
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a claim regarding analytic functions, specifically that if a sequence of distinct numbers converges to a point in the domain of an analytic function and the function evaluates to zero at those points, then the function must be identically zero in the connected component of the domain containing that point.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to prove the case when the limit point is zero, using the properties of power series and continuity. They express a desire to show that all coefficients in the power series expansion are zero through induction on the derivatives.
  • Another participant confirms the original poster's reasoning and mentions the uniqueness of analytic continuation.
  • One participant raises a concern about the induction step for the derivatives, specifically questioning how to show that the derivative at the next order is also zero.
  • A suggestion is made to compute the limit of a specific expression as the variable approaches zero, using the sequence that converges to zero.

Discussion Status

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of proving a mathematical claim without external resources beyond the initial Wikipedia reference. The discussion includes assumptions about the properties of analytic functions and their derivatives.

Dunkle
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is a claim from a Wikipedia page about analytic functions (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_function), and I can't seem to prove it.

If (r_{n}) is a sequence of distinct numbers such that f(r_{n}) = 0 for all n and this sequence converges to a point r in the domain of D, then f is identically zero on the connected component of D containing r.

Homework Equations



f(x) = \sum a_{n}x^{n}

f(x_{n})=0

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm trying to prove the case when r=0. If f is analytic, then it can be represented by some power series. If you look at some sequence (r_n) = 1/n, then the zeros of f bunch up near 0. It is clear to me that f(0)=0 (since f is continuous), so a_{0}=0. It is also clear to me that f '(0)=0, and so a_{1}=0. It seems like the way to go is to show (using induction) that each a_{n} is 0 by showing that all derivatives at 0 are equal to 0.

Thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's correct. It follows from this that two analytic functions that have the same values in the r_n are identitical. Analytic continuation is thus unique.
 
I am having problems with the induction for the derivatives. I already showed f '(0)=0. Assuming

f^{(k)}(0)=0,

we need to show that

f^{(k+1)}(0)=0.

We compute

f^{(k+1)}(0)=\frac{f^{(k)}(x)-f^{(k)}(0)}{x-0}=\frac{f^{(k)}(x)}{x}

But I don't see why this is 0. Any suggestions?
 
You need to take limit of x to zero. You can compute that limit by taking for x the sequence of the rn that tend to zero and computing the lmit for n to infinity. For all n you have that:

\frac{f^{\left k\right)}\left(r_{n}\right)}{r_{n}}=0

So, the limit is clearly zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K