Showing differentiability at 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter SpringPhysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiability
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the function f(x,y) = |xy| is differentiable at the point (0,0). Participants clarify that while the absolute value function is not differentiable at one dimension, the multivariable case requires a different approach. The use of polar coordinates is suggested to analyze the limit as (x,y) approaches (0,0), specifically showing that lim |xy|/sqrt(x^2+y^2) = 0. There is confusion about the definition of differentiability in higher dimensions, but it is acknowledged that the matrix A can be set to zero to satisfy the conditions for differentiability. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need to carefully apply the definitions and consider the function's behavior near the origin.
SpringPhysics
Messages
104
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that f(x,y) = |xy| is differentiable at 0.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I thought absolute value functions are not differentiable at 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SpringPhysics said:

Homework Statement


Show that f(x,y) = |xy| is differentiable at 0.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I thought absolute value functions are not differentiable at 0?

f(x)=|x| isn't differentiable at x=0. f(x,y)=|xy| at x=0 and y=0 is. Now try and show it.
 
I am attempting to find a matrix A so that the definition of differentiability (in higher dimensions) holds...but I cannot seem to do so because I cannot cancel out the absolute value of h depending on whether h is negative or positive. Is this the right direction?

Sorry, I am not even sure which definition/theorem of differentiability I should use, since I have only learned of the definition and the C1 condition, but this function isn't even C1.

EDIT: Do I use the sgn(x) function? f(x,y) = |xy| = |x||y|. So the partial derivatives are x|y|/|x| and y|x|/|y|, unless x, y are zero, in which case the partial derivatives are 0. So then the partial derivatives exist. But they are still not continuous at 0...
 
Last edited:
SpringPhysics said:
I am attempting to find a matrix A so that the definition of differentiability (in higher dimensions) holds...but I cannot seem to do so because I cannot cancel out the absolute value of h depending on whether h is negative or positive. Is this the right direction?

Sorry, I am not even sure which definition/theorem of differentiability I should use, since I have only learned of the definition and the C1 condition, but this function isn't even C1.

EDIT: Do I use the sgn(x) function? f(x,y) = |xy| = |x||y|. So the partial derivatives are x|y|/|x| and y|x|/|y|, unless x, y are zero, in which case the partial derivatives are 0. So then the partial derivatives exist. But they are still not continuous at 0...

Yes, I don't think the partial derivatives are continuous at (0,0). But that shouldn't stop you. Try to show the matrix A=0 works. Try thinking about polar coordinates.
 
I had previously attempted A = 0. Now that I use polar coordinates, I end up with basically the same problem...except that my x and y are now r cos theta and r sin theta. I know that each are bounded by r, but that still leaves me to deal with the r. Everything else goes to zero except the terms with the constant r. Am I on the right track? Thanks so much for your help.
 
SpringPhysics said:
I had previously attempted A = 0. Now that I use polar coordinates, I end up with basically the same problem...except that my x and y are now r cos theta and r sin theta. I know that each are bounded by r, but that still leaves me to deal with the r. Everything else goes to zero except the terms with the constant r. Am I on the right track? Thanks so much for your help.

Well, you need to show lim |xy|/sqrt(x^2+y^2)=0 as r->0, right? Wouldn't that show A=0 is the matrix derivative?
 
Dick said:
Well, you need to show lim |xy|/sqrt(x^2+y^2)=0 as r->0, right? Wouldn't that show A=0 is the matrix derivative?

Sorry, I just lost you. I thought the definition for the derivative is
lim [f(a+h) - f(a) - Ah]/|h| as h -> 0, for h in R2?
 
SpringPhysics said:
Sorry, I just lost you. I thought the definition for the derivative is
lim [f(a+h) - f(a) - Ah]/|h| as h -> 0, for h in R2?

The definition of A is lim [f(a+h) - f(a) - Ah]/|h|=0 as h -> 0, for h in R^2
a=(0,0). h=(x,y). f(a)=|0*0|=0. Ah=0 since A=0. f(a+h)=|xy|. |h|=sqrt(x^2+y^2). Try and stay with me, buddy.
 
Dick said:
a=(0,0). h=(x,y). f(a)=|0*0|=0. Ah=0 since A=0. f(a+h)=|xy|. |h|=sqrt(x^2+y^2). Try and stay with me, buddy.

Oh wow, I feel so stupid. I forgot that I was differentiating at 0, so I had point a = (x,y) and I was stressing out about why the limit wouldn't go to 0. LOL. Thank you greatly for your help and patience!
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K