Showing f is a solution to quantum oscillator SWE

infinitylord
Messages
34
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


For a 1-dimensional simple harmonic oscillator, the Hamiltonian operator is of the form:
H = -ħ2/2m ∂xx + 1/2 mω2x2
and
n = Enψn = (n+1/2)ħωψn

where ψn is the wave function of the nth state.

defining a new function fn to be:

fn = xψn + ħ/mω ∂xψn

show that fn is a solution to the low energy SWE. I.e. that:

Hfn = (En - ħω)fn

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that:
ψn = Cne-mωx2/2Hn(x)
where Hn(x) is an nth order Hermite Polynomial.
I was wondering what the procedure for determining this would be. I'm assuming I could plug this expression for ψn into the expression for fn, and then apply the Hamiltonian operator. But I'm not sure how that would simplify, and it also seems very complicated to plug in. Any help would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you are meant to let the operator H act on the expression for fn and show that Hfn reduces to (En - ħω)fn.

It will require a fair amount of manipulation and use of the fact that Hψn = Enψn. But nothing else is needed.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top