Shwoing the sensitivity of many body systems oi small perturbations

In summary, the problem involves observing the motion of frictionless, elastically colliding billiard balls. With sensible assumptions about size and gravitational pull, it is shown that after 10 collisions, small perturbations caused by a person entering the room can completely alter the trajectories of the balls. The approach involves considering one ball rebounding between a fixed ball and a wall, and taking into account the vertical force and displacement caused by the person's gravitational pull. Further iterations can be done to fully analyze the effect of the person on the ball's trajectory.
  • #1
XCBRA
18
0

Homework Statement



Imagine we are observing the motion of frictionless, elastically colliding billiard balls.
Using sensible assumptions about the size of things, show that, if someone enters the
room, small deflections of the balls due this visitor's gravitational pull will completely
alter their trajectories after just about 10 collisions.

Hint: For simplicity, consider all balls but one fixed in place and then analyse the
motion of one ball.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Not entirely sure how to approach this problem. I chose to consider a one ball rebouinding between a wall and another fixed ball, such that the distance between the wall and th3 fised ball is 2m, and the the bal was moving at 0.1 m/s. Then i assumed the person is 2 m away perpendicular to the direction of motion. the person is 70kg and the ball is 1kg.

For image
http://img802.imageshack.us/img802/1383/smallperturbationsprobl.png

[tex] F = \frac{Gm_pm_b}{r^2} [/tex]
[tex] F=\frac{6.6726*10^-11*70*1}{2^2} [/tex]
[tex] F=1.1*10^-9 [/tex]

Then if we assume tyen collsions, the ball will travle 20m horizontally and hence will travel for 200s.

If we consider only the vertical force and assume that it is constant.

since [itex] F=ma [/itex]
[tex] a=1.16*10^-9 [/tex]

[tex] s=ut+\frac{at^2}{2} [/tex]

therefore s = 2.3366*10^-5 m, whcih is clearly not enough to be considered to have completely altered the trajectory of the ball.

I don't think this approach is right, so please could you advise how it would be best to tackle this problem. Thanks for the help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You have a correct approach. It is a first time approximation to see if the person has an effect upon the ball. The centre of mass has moved s = 2.3366*10^-5 m ( 2.3366*10^-3 cm ). If your ball radius is 2.336 cm that is s/r = 0.001 or 0.1%. Or the ball centre is off sin(theta) = s/r; where theta = 0.057 degrees, from its head on contact point. Or the ball has moved sin(alpha) = s/L; where L= 2m, and alpha = 0.0003 degrees from the original straight line contact with the cushion.

Next step is to do each of the 10 iterations.
Have the ball bounce to the cushion and back to the stationary ball. When the ball hits a flat surface at an angle alpha, it rebounds at the same angle. What happens when the ball hits another ball of the same angle - it hits at a tangent from the head on so the angle alpha doubles.
Do that for 10 hits and see what you get.
 

1. What is the purpose of showing the sensitivity of many body systems to small perturbations?

The purpose of showing the sensitivity of many body systems to small perturbations is to understand how small changes or disturbances can affect the behavior and functioning of complex systems. This can help us predict and prevent potential disruptions or failures in these systems, and also improve our understanding of their dynamics.

2. How is the sensitivity of many body systems to small perturbations measured?

The sensitivity of many body systems to small perturbations is typically measured using mathematical models and simulations. These models take into account the interactions and dynamics of the different components within the system, and can predict how changes in one component can affect the entire system.

3. What are some examples of many body systems that are sensitive to small perturbations?

Some examples of many body systems that are sensitive to small perturbations include climate systems, ecosystems, financial markets, and neural networks. These systems have many interconnected components that can be affected by small changes, leading to large-scale consequences.

4. Can the sensitivity of many body systems to small perturbations be beneficial?

Yes, the sensitivity of many body systems to small perturbations can be beneficial. It allows us to identify potential weaknesses or vulnerabilities in these systems and take proactive measures to prevent or mitigate potential disruptions. It also helps us understand the complex behavior of these systems and make more accurate predictions.

5. How can the sensitivity of many body systems to small perturbations be applied in real-world situations?

The sensitivity of many body systems to small perturbations can be applied in various real-world situations, such as in disaster management, financial risk assessment, and environmental conservation. By understanding the sensitivity of these systems, we can make more informed decisions and develop strategies to minimize the impact of small perturbations on these systems.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
854
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
705
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Mechanics
3
Replies
80
Views
10K
Replies
31
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
946
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
162
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top