Sigma Polarisation: Learn What it is & How It's Defined

AI Thread Summary
Sigma polarization refers to the component of electromagnetic waves that is perpendicular to the plane of incidence, while p-polarization is parallel to it. In the context of laser cooling, sigma plus and sigma minus describe circularly polarized light based on the rotation of the electric field around the local magnetic field, not the direction of propagation. The quantization axis defined by the magnetic field influences how atoms interact with the electric field of the photon. For a deeper understanding, the book "Atomic Physics" by Demtröder is recommended, particularly regarding the Zeeman effect. Understanding these definitions is crucial for grasping the complexities of polarization in various applications.
edallica
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
can anyone point me in the right direction to somewhere i can find out about sigma polarisation.

i want to know how it is defined.

thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
If you're asking about polarization of electromagnetic waves try this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarization

Basically p-polarization (pi) refers to the component of the wave parallel to a surface while s-polarization (sigma) refers to the component perpendicular to the s-polarized component.
 
Depends on the context.

When dealing with polarisation effects, it is necessary to adopt a frame of reference. For example, when dealing with angled reflections off surfaces, p is used to define the component parallel to the plane of incidence and s is used to describe the component perpendicular to the plane of incidence (the denotion s comes from the german(?) word for perpendicular). There are many other examples where p and s refer to different components.

Pi and Sigma are simply greek designations for p and s.

Claude.
 
sorry guys i should have been more specific. I am trying to get my head round the definitions for laser cooling. i always thought that sigma plus and sigma minus were just names for circularly polarized light, and described the way the E-vector rotated out a circle if you looked down the path which the light travels. but i know this is not the case, it is defined as the the rotation about the local magnetic field rather than about the direction of propagation.

what i really wanted was a place that told me why it is defined as the rotation about he local magnetic field and not the direction propagation.

sorry for not being clear!

if anyone can help here i would be really grateful
 
What follows can be read in Demtröder "atomic phyiscs", keyword "Zeeman effect".

The B-field defines the quantization axis. That is, because the atom does not care, in which direction the photon travels, but just interacts with its electric field. Therefore all what matters to the atom is the direction the electric field of the photon oscillates.

Now, put the B-field along the z-axis and look at the emission proceess instead of the absorption. The atom has several ways to emit the photon.
1,2) into the z-direction (=axial direction) + circular polarized light. Depending on the rotation direction (clockwise or anti-clockwise) you call these photons sigma- or sigma+
3,4) into the radial direction + linear polarized light. Depending on the polarization the photon is either pi or sigma polarized. ONCE AGAIN: sigma (withou plus or minus) means LINEAR polarized.

It's not trivial, so you better check out the book.

Cheers.
semoi
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top