Sign of voltage across inductor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the sign of the voltage across an inductor when the current is ramped up. It is established that according to Lenz's law, an induced electromotive force (Emf) opposes the change in current, suggesting that the Emf points from ground to the voltage point V2. However, confusion arises regarding the implications of this direction, as it seems to indicate that V2 would be negative if the current flows against the Emf. Participants clarify that if the current flows through the resistor towards the inductor, V2 is actually positive, as the voltage at the inductor/resistor point is higher than ground. Ultimately, the thread highlights the importance of correctly interpreting the relationship between current, voltage, and the direction of the induced Emf in inductive circuits.
ElectroWhat
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
I need help understanding the sign of voltages across an inductor.

Homework Statement



There is a current source providing current I to a resitor of resistance R in series with an inductor of inductance L, of which the other end is grounded. The voltage at the current source is V1 and the voltage at the inductor/resistor point is V2.

Explain the sign of V2 if the current is ramped up.

Homework Equations



I know from Lenz's law that
Emf = - d Bflux / dt = - L dI/dt.

The Attempt at a Solution



From Lenz's law, if the current is increasing, an Emf will be created in the opposite direction of the current increase. So the Emf will be pointing from ground to the V2 point. So the voltage will be increasing from V2 to ground ... so the voltage is NEGATIVE?

But that doesn't make any sense. Here's what I'm having trouble with:

This would mean the current is not only flowing AGAINST the Emf, but actually increasing against it.

What am I doing wrong?
 
  • Like
Likes Syed Lateef
Physics news on Phys.org
"So the Emf will be pointing from ground to the V2 point. "
Right.

"So the voltage will be increasing from V2 to ground ... so the voltage is NEGATIVE?"

No, why do you think so? Assuming that the current flows through the resistor towards the inductor, (see pic) the negative emf means a voltage source which opposes this current, that is, positive pole at the resistor/inductor point with respect to the ground: V2 is positive.

ehild
 
Last edited:
I can't see your attachment. It says "pending approval" on my end.
ehild said:
"So the Emf will be pointing from ground to the V2 point. "
Right.
If the force is pointing from ground to the V2 point, then the current is flowing against the force. No?

One of Maxwell's equations is:
\nabla \times \vec{E} = - \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \vec{B}
Using stoke's theorem this gives:
\oint_{\partial S} \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{l} = - \frac {\partial}{\partial t} \int_S \vec{B}\cdot d\vec{a}

So the change in current will create a change in magnetic field, which will create an electric field against the change in current.

It really does appear that the electric field is pointing from ground to the V2 point, and the current is flowing against the electric field. How is this possible?

And if the electric field is pointing from ground to the V2 point, which means going from ground to V2 is going down in potential, then V2 must have a lower potential than ground. V2 is therefore negative.

Something is wrong here, but I can't find the problem with the logic.
 
Last edited:
The voltage across an inductor is:
V = L \frac{dI}{dt}

The question only gives you enough details to get the sign of the voltage, but that is all you wanted anyway.

Or are you asking how to derive that from Lenz's law?

Hmm... I'm not good at tracking down sign errors. I don't really see what you've done wrong there. Sorry. All I can verify is that it is indeed wrong as you suspect.

Hopefully someone else can see what is wrong and lead you through it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
318
Replies
1
Views
745
Replies
16
Views
967
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Back
Top