Significance of 1/s in Root Loci & Nyquist Stability

  • Thread starter Thread starter maverick280857
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Significance
AI Thread Summary
The transformation s → 1/s in control systems is significant as it maps points at infinity to the origin, which can provide insights into high-frequency behavior in root loci and Nyquist stability analysis. This substitution raises questions about the validity of these methods under transformation and whether the characteristic equation remains invertible. While it can help visualize system behavior, it requires careful consideration of the corresponding changes in Laplace or Fourier transforms. The discussion emphasizes the need to understand how this mapping affects stability criteria and system responses. Overall, the transformation offers a different perspective on analyzing system dynamics in feedback control.
maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Hi

Suppose we have a closed feedback system with loop gain = L(s) = G(s)H(s). The characteristic equation is

1 + L(s) = 0

What is the significance of the transformation s \rightarrow 1/s and what bearing does it have on root loci and Nyquist stability?

I can see that the points s = \pm \infty will be mapped to s = 0.

Thanks,
Vivek.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
I don't get why you transform s to 1/s. Can you elaborate more on the question? Do you mean the invertibility of the char. eq i.e. (1+L(s))^{-1} ?
 
Last edited:
Well, the question really is: what happens to the Root Locus and the Nyquist Stability criterion when I replace s by 1/s? Are they valid? Also, what is the physical significance of such a transformation. Intuitively, I think that such a substitution allows us to map points at infinity to the origin (and conversely)...so, it allows us to get a better "idea" of the high frequency behavior. But I am not fully convinced.
 
But we have already an understanding of the points at infinity, it is completely meaningful when we take s|_{j\omega}\to\infty.

Besides that, though I am not sure, I don't think that it will map the high frequency region as such because you have to also modify the laplace or Fourier transform accordingly.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Back
Top