Significant figures in seconds to hours calculation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the appropriate number of significant figures when converting time from minutes and seconds to hours. The conversion of 29 minutes and 57 seconds results in 0.499166667 hours, which should be expressed with four significant figures. The original time measurement, accurate to +/- 1 second, translates to 1767 seconds, confirming that the final result should maintain four decimal places, specifically 0.4991 hours.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of significant figures in measurements
  • Knowledge of unit conversion, specifically from seconds to hours
  • Basic arithmetic operations involving time calculations
  • Familiarity with precision and accuracy in scientific measurements
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the rules of significant figures in detail
  • Practice unit conversion techniques, focusing on time
  • Explore the implications of precision in scientific calculations
  • Learn about error analysis and how it affects measurement reporting
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or chemistry courses, educators teaching measurement concepts, and anyone involved in scientific calculations requiring precision and accuracy.

RossH
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
SOLVED: Significant figures in seconds to hours calculation

Homework Statement


Not exactly a problem, but if I have minutes/seconds and am changing to hours, how many significant figures are there? For example: 29 minutes 57 seconds =0.499166667 hours needs ? significant figures.

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, a second to 1/3600 hours. Therefore, I think I might want to measure to a precision of one ten-thousandth of an hour, or possibly 1/1000 hours. I'm not sure which. I know that the minutes doesn't affect the calculation, and I know that the unit conversion is considered to have infinite sig figs.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The implication is that the original value is accurate to +/- 1 second. If the converted value is to have a similar level of precision, and 1s = 0.00028 hr, then it looks like you'll want four decimal places and the last place will be taken as +/- 3.
 
gneill said:
The implication is that the original value is accurate to +/- 1 second. If the converted value is to have a similar level of precision, and 1s = 0.00028 hr, then it looks like you'll want four decimal places and the last place will be taken as +/- 3.

Thanks!
 
I agree the value is accurate to the nearest 1 second, but would approach it differently. If you convert the 29 minutes 57 seconds to seconds, that's 60·29+57 seconds or 1767 seconds. That's 4 significant figures -- which for this problem (0.4991... hours) means to the 4th decimal place in agreement with what gneill said.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K