Silicon Junction Diode: Charge Density and Potential Analysis

Slightly
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a silicon junction diode, the region of the planar junction between n-type and p-type
semiconductors can be approximately represented as two adjoining slabs of charge, one
negative and one positive. Away from the junction, outside these charge layers, the
potential is constant, with a value of Vn in the n-type material and Vp in the p-type
material. Given that the difference between Vp and Vn is 0.3 V, and that the thickness
of each of the two slabs of charge is 10^-4 m, find the charge density in each of the
two slabs, and make a graph of the potential V as a function of position through the
junction. What is the strength of the electric field at the midplane?


Homework Equations



I using the relationship that the second derivative of the potential is equal to σ/ε.
I have certain conditions. Putting the middle of the bar at x=0, the potential must be continuous through the middle and I have conditions set at the endpoints

phi_1(-10^-4)=0
phi_2(10^-4)=.3
phi_1(0)=phi_2(0)
σ1+σ2 = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



I get two expressions

phi_1(x)= σ1/(2ε)x^2+Ax + B
phi_2(x) = σ2/(2ε)x^2+Cx+D

I found that A=C and B=D using the conditions, but now I have too many unknowns and not enough equations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Update 1. Found that B = .15
by substituting σ1 for -σ2 and plugging in the values of 10^-4 and -10^-4 into the respective equations and added them.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top