Silly work done on a car question.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mass of a car given the work done to accelerate it from 22.8 m/s to 27.7 m/s. Initially, confusion arises regarding the correct application of the work-energy principle and the kinetic energy formula. Participants clarify that the work done equals the change in kinetic energy, leading to the equation ΔKE = KEf - KEi. The user ultimately resolves their misunderstanding by correctly applying the kinetic energy formula, resulting in a calculated mass of 1.123x10^3 kg. The exchange highlights the importance of accurately using physics equations to solve for unknown variables.
MarcZZ
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



It takes 139 kJ of work to accelerate a car from 22.8 m/s to 27.7 m/s. What is the car's mass?

Homework Equations



Well, we know that work is also known as J and J is = to kg*m^2/s^2 so we can use the equation J = m(vf - vi) to solve this I think.

The Attempt at a Solution



So We know that 139 kJ is equal to 139x10^3 J. Also m(27.7 m/s - 22.8 m/s) = m(4.9m/s), so combing these we assume that 139000 J = ?kg(4.9m/s) But from here I'm getting confused badly. I think I'm misusing the equation somehow as I'm not sure how to manipulate the 4.9m/s in order to get rid of the kg*m^2/s^2 units on the other side.

Any help will be much appreciated. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MarcZZ said:
Well, we know that work is also known as J and J is = to kg*m^2/s^2 so we can use the equation J = m(vf - vi) to solve this I think.
The work done will equal the change in the car's kinetic energy--not momentum. (That's why your units are not working out.) How would you calculate that?
 
KE = 1/2mv^2. I had pondered this, so in other words it's possible to use my change in velocity in place of V in the KE formula?
 
MarcZZ said:
KE = 1/2mv^2. I had pondered this, so in other words it's possible to use my change in velocity in place of V in the KE formula?
What you need is ΔKE = KEf - KEi.
 
I'm sorry but how can that be usable if you don't have the mass? Isn't it essentially equal to m = 2K / (delta V)^2. Sorry, I'm getting confused I just don't see this.

Edit: Never mind. I think I'm misunderstanding stuff because some notes I took in my lecture I miscopied. :/
 
MarcZZ said:
I'm sorry but how can that be usable if you don't have the mass?
You'll be using this to solve for the mass. (As you've probably figured out by now.)
 
Doc Al said:
You'll be using this to solve for the mass. (As you've probably figured out by now.)

Ahh never mind. I figure out what the problem was, I had used the formula you mentioned before but divided it by 2 as opposed to multiplying it. I've got it now the answer is 1.123x10^3 kg. Thanks very much for your help. :)
 

Similar threads

Back
Top