Silver-Cadmium Electrochemical Cell

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on constructing a silver-cadmium electrochemical cell using specified materials. The setup involves placing silver nitrate and silver wire in one beaker, while cadmium nitrate and cadmium wire are in another, connected by a salt bridge. In this cell, cadmium is oxidized to cadmium ions, while silver ions are reduced to silver metal, with the net ionic equation being 2Ag+(aq) + Cd(s) ⇌ Cd2+(aq) + 2Ag(s). The copper wire serves as a conductor, providing a pathway for electron flow between the electrodes. Overall, this setup illustrates the fundamental principles of electrochemical reactions and electron transfer.
Wardling
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
You are given the following materials:
 Silver wire
 A 0.10 mol L-1 solution of cadmium nitrate
 Cadmium wire
 A 0.10 mol L-1 solution of silver nitrate
 A salt bridge
 Copper wire
 Beakers and other glassware as required
Draw a labelled sketch of your cell. Describe how the electrochemical cell will function. Include equations for the reactions and what you would expect to see happen.

I know that if I ignore the copper wire, I can put the AgNO3 and the Ag wire into one beaker, and the Cd(NO3)2 and Cd wire into another beaker. I can connect the two using the salt bridge. The electrons will flow from the Cd to the Ag. The Cd will be oxidised (Cd >><< Cd2+ + 2e-), and the Ag will be reduced (2AG+ + 2e- >><< 2Ag). The net ionic equation is: 2Ag+(aq) + Cd(s) >><< Cd2+(aq) + 2Ag(s).

My question is what does the copper wire do? Is it to make the current reversible? Or for plating?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Silly me, the copper wire connects the two electrodes providing a path for the electrons to travel through!
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top