Simple Algebra problem - Solving for 2 of the same unknown

  • Thread starter Thread starter smaan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equation ln(0.0693/0.0475) = (70435/8.314)((T3-298)/(T3*298)) for T3, where the presence of two T3 variables complicates the process. A participant expresses confusion over the dual T3s, suggesting that algebraic manipulation might be flawed. Another contributor clarifies that by rearranging the equation, it can be simplified to eliminate one T3, making it easier to solve. They recommend multiplying both sides by the denominator to facilitate the solution. Ultimately, the key to solving the equation lies in reducing the complexity by managing the fractions effectively.
smaan
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



ln(0.0693/0.0475) = (70435/8.314)((T3-298)/(T3*298))

Solve for T3



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The fact that there are 2 T3's is really throwing me off, I feel that I am doing something algebraically wrong.

0.377 = 8471.9((T3-298)/(T3*298))

How would I solve for T3?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
smaan said:

Homework Statement



ln(0.0693/0.0475) = (70435/8.314)((T3-298)/(T3*298))

Solve for T3

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



The fact that there are 2 T3's is really throwing me off, I feel that I am doing something algebraically wrong.

0.377 = 8471.9((T3-298)/(T3*298))

How would I solve for T3?
\displaystyle \frac{T_3-298}{298T_3}=\frac{T_3}{298T_3}-\frac{298}{298T_3}
\displaystyle =\frac{1}{298}-\frac{1}{T_3}​
Now there's only one T3 .
 
Sometimes I find "getting rid" of the fraction helpful for seeing the solution. Basically multiply both sides by the denominator (of the RHS) and expand. Then you collect like terms and everything else is easy.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top