Simple Charges/Induction Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rockstar47
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To induce a net negative charge on a metal sphere using a charged rubber rod, the rod must be negatively charged. Bringing the negatively charged rod near the sphere causes electrons in the sphere to be repelled, leading to a concentration of positive charge on the side closest to the rod. If the sphere is grounded during this process, some electrons can leave the sphere, resulting in a net positive charge. To achieve a net negative charge, the sphere must not be grounded; instead, the rubber rod can be moved away after the electrons have migrated to the sphere, leaving it negatively charged. The term "induce" in this context refers to the process of causing a charge separation without direct contact.
Rockstar47
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How can you use a charged rubber rod to induce a net negative charge on a metal sphere?

Homework Equations



None.

The Attempt at a Solution



OK, I understand the basics, but it seems like this question should be worded so as to inducing a net "positive" charge on the metal sphere. It seems key to me that the rubber rod would have to be negatively charged, and if we're talking about induction (the two objects not touching), it would seem intuitive that bringing the rubber rod near the sphere would cause electrons to migrate to the side of the sphere opposite the sphere. If the sphere had a ground, some electrons would completely leave the sphere and the cutting the ground would leave the sphere with a net positive charge. But how the heck can you get the sphere to have a negative charge via induction? Or is there a means by which that rubber rod can be positively charged?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question doesn't say you have to charge the metal spherer via induction.
The terms induce there is not a scientific term. Its meaning is more like "cause".
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top