Simple faraday's law problem (phi = what?)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the induced electromotive force (emf) in a circular loop of wire surrounding a toroid with sinusoidal current. The magnetic field inside the toroid is derived using Ampère's Law, leading to the expression for B. A key point of contention is whether to use the cross-sectional area of the toroid or the area of the larger loop for calculating the flux. It is clarified that the relevant area for flux is indeed the toroid's cross-section, as the magnetic field is not uniform across the larger loop. The conversation concludes that the original approach is close to correct, especially given the condition that x is much smaller than R.
darksyesider
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




A toroid with N windings and radius R has cross sectional radius x (x<<R).
The current running through the wires is given by ##I = I_0\sin (\omega t)##.
There is a magnetic field in the center of the toroid.

A loop of wire of radius three times that of the toroid is placed around the cross section of the toroid
(like http://s3.amazonaws.com/answer-board-image/9fa3691b-46c6-4de7-b608-82705d9efa60.gif, but it's circular, not a rectangle).

Find the induced emf in the circular loop of wire.

Homework Equations




E = -dphi/dt

The Attempt at a Solution



##\int B\cdot ds = \mu_0 I\implies B(2\pi R) = N\mu_0 I \implies B = \dfrac{\mu_0 N (I_0\sin\omega t)}{2\pi R}## (*)

then ##\mathcal{E} = \dfrac{- d\phi}{dt} = - \dfrac{d(BA)}{dt} = -\pi x^2 \dfrac{dB}{dt}##, where dB/dt is just the derivative of (*).


My question is, that should it be ##-\pi x^2## (the cross section of the toroid) or should it be the area of the loop ( pi*(3x)^2) ?
My reasoning for pi*x^2 is that since there is no flux at parts of the circular loop, it's just the area of the cross section (no flux since no magnetic field!).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to integrate B across the toroid's cross-section to the the total flux. B is a function of the radial distance from the toroid's center (not the cross-section center; I mean the center of the hole). You have oversimplified the problem by using the value of B at the outermost radial distance R.
 
EDIT: I don't see why that is true, isn't R fixed?
 
Last edited:
darksyesider said:
EDIT: I don't see why that is true, isn't R fixed?

Sure is, but the B field isn't confined to r = R.
 
can you specify where it is incorrect? I still don't see what you are referring to.
 
darksyesider said:
can you specify where it is incorrect? I still don't see what you are referring to.

As I said, you have determined the B field for r=R but have done nothing to determine what it is for r<R. R is the OUTER radius of the toroid. Ir also has an inner radius, which is R-2x. So we have R-2x < r < R.

B is a function of the radius r: B = B(r). You have computed B(R) only. Figure out why B(r) > B(R), r < R, just the way you found B(R).
 
Is there an elementary way to solve this then? (AP Physics C level)?

If the cross section was a square, it would be easy, but here it's harder.
 
darksyesider said:
Is there an elementary way to solve this then? (AP Physics C level)?

If the cross section was a square, it would be easy, but here it's harder.

In either case it requires integrating strips of the cross-section, from r = R-2x to r=R, to get the total flux which is what you need.
.
EDIT: ON SECOND THOUGHTS, since you were given x << R your original post solution is close to correct and probably what was intended.

I don't understand how you came up with your alternative area pi(3x)^2. What has a radius 3x?
 
Last edited:
The larger loop of wire.
 
  • #10
darksyesider said:
The larger loop of wire.

Oh, right. But the area you want is, as you said, where the flux is, which is in the toroid cross-section only. Good work and sorry if I sidetracked you. If R >> x had not been given you would have had to integrate.
 
Back
Top