Simple Fourier coefficient exponential

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



I think I am being stupid, I am trying to show that

## \int^{T}_{0} e^i\frac{2\pi(n-m)t}{T} dt = 0 ## [1] if ## n \neq m##
## = T ## if ##n=m##, ##T## the period.

Homework Equations


[/B]
I am using the following ##cos## and ##sin## orthogonal identities:

1) ##\int^{2 \pi / g}_0 sin ( n g x) sin ( m g x ) dx = \delta_{nm} ##
2) ##\int^{2 \pi / g}_0 cos ( n g x) cos ( m g x ) dx = \delta_{nm} ##
3) ##\int^{2 \pi / g}_0 sin ( n g x) cos ( m g x ) dx = \delta_{nm} ##

The Attempt at a Solution



## e^i\frac{2\pi(n-m)t}{T} dt = e^i\frac{2\pi(n)t}{T} . e^i\frac{2\pi(n-m)t}{T} ##
(Let ##g=\frac { 2 \pi i}{T} ##)
##= (cos ( g n t) + i sin (gnt) ).(cos ( g m t) - i sin ( g m t))##

So using the orthogonal identities [1] the contribution to [1] from the ##coscos## and ##sinsin## term gives ##2 \delta _{nm} ##, and then from the cross ##sin## and ##cos## terms I am getting

## i \delta_{nm} - i \delta_{nm} = 0 ##.

So I am getting ## 2 \delta _{nm} ##

Which I can see straight off is wrong since I am not dividing by the period to get the coefficient. (independent of it)

Many thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mmmhh, I think ##g=\frac{2\pi}{T}##, using the orthogonal relations is good, in fact another way can be calculating directing the integral treating ##i## as a constant, in this way you can see the rersult that is still immediate ...

Ssnow
 
binbagsss said:

Homework Statement



I think I am being stupid, I am trying to show that

## \int^{T}_{0} e^i\frac{2\pi(n-m)t}{T} dt = 0 ## [1] if ## n \neq m##
## = T ## if ##n=m##, ##T## the period.

Homework Equations


[/B]
I am using the following ##cos## and ##sin## orthogonal identities:

1) ##\int^{2 \pi / g}_0 sin ( n g x) sin ( m g x ) dx = \delta_{nm} ##
2) ##\int^{2 \pi / g}_0 cos ( n g x) cos ( m g x ) dx = \delta_{nm} ##
3) ##\int^{2 \pi / g}_0 sin ( n g x) cos ( m g x ) dx = \delta_{nm} ##

The Attempt at a Solution



## e^i\frac{2\pi(n-m)t}{T} dt = e^i\frac{2\pi(n)t}{T} . e^i\frac{2\pi(n-m)t}{T} ##
(Let ##g=\frac { 2 \pi i}{T} ##)
##= (cos ( g n t) + i sin (gnt) ).(cos ( g m t) - i sin ( g m t))##

So using the orthogonal identities [1] the contribution to [1] from the ##coscos## and ##sinsin## term gives ##2 \delta _{nm} ##, and then from the cross ##sin## and ##cos## terms I am getting

## i \delta_{nm} - i \delta_{nm} = 0 ##.

So I am getting ## 2 \delta _{nm} ##

Which I can see straight off is wrong since I am not dividing by the period to get the coefficient. (independent of it)

Many thanks in advance.

If ##a \neq 0## we have
$$\int_0^T e^{i a t/T} \, dt = \frac{1}{a} iT \left(1-e^{ia}\right)$$.
Put ##a = 2 \pi (n-m)## and simplify, assuming ##n,m## are unequal integers.

Of course, when ##a=0## the integral is just ##\int_0^T 1 \, dt. ##.
 
  • Like
Likes binbagsss
Ssnow said:
mmmhh, I think ##g=\frac{2\pi}{T}##, using the orthogonal relations is good, in fact another way can be calculating directing the integral treating ##i## as a constant, in this way you can see the rersult that is still immediate ...

Ssnow

so where have I gone wrong?
 
Ray Vickson said:
If ##a \neq 0## we have
$$\int_0^T e^{i a t/T} \, dt = \frac{1}{a} iT \left(1-e^{ia}\right)$$.
Put ##a = 2 \pi (n-m)## and simplify, assuming ##n,m## are unequal integers.

Of course, when ##a=0## the integral is just ##\int_0^T 1 \, dt. ##.

but what is the error in my working anybody please?
 
binbagsss said:
but what is the error in my working anybody please?

Your equations (1), (2), (3) are incorrect. ##\int_0^{2\pi/g} \cos(n g t) \cos(m g t) \, dt = c \delta_{m,n} ,## but ##c \neq 1##.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top