Simple Gear Ratio Problem: Solving for Wheel Rotation with Formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the wheel rotation in relation to pedal rotation on a bicycle, given a sprocket ratio of 2.5. The formula ωwheel=(R1/R2)ωpedal is used to derive that the wheel turns 2.5 times for each full rotation of the pedals. The relationship is further explained through the concept of tooth pitch, where the number of teeth on the crank and wheel sprockets determines the gear ratio. It is emphasized that the ratio can be expressed in various ways, such as teeth, circumference, or radius, as they are all proportional. Understanding the gearing in terms of distance traveled per crank turn provides a more practical metric for cyclists.
alexcc17
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a bicycle, the ratio between the size of the wheel sprocket to the size of the crank sprocket is 2.5 which means...

An example of one of the answer choices is:

The rear wheel turns ___ times for every full rotation of the pedals.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I feel like that should be a really simple question if I had formula. We were given that:
ωwheel=(R1/R2)ωpedal
R1 is the radius of the crank sprocket
R2 is the radius of the wheel sprocket

This would mean that ωwheel=(2/5)ωpedal, but that doesn't really help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No complicated math required. The wheel turns 2.5 times for every one turn of the crank.
 
ωwheel=(R1/R2)ωpedal

Rearrange to give..

ωwheel/ωpedal = R1/R2

But perhaps it would help to understand it from first principles? Let's say TP is the Tooth Pitch in inches. If the crank sprocket had 50 teeth each revolution of the crank advances the chain a distance of..

50 * TP

Then if the wheel sprocket had 20 teeth how many revolutions would it make...

= 50*TP / 20*TP

TP cancels

= 2.5

It's quickly obvious that the gearing depends on the ratio of the number of teeth on each.

In fact the ratio depends on the size of the gears regardless of how you specify the size. For example you could specify the size in terms of:

Teeth
Circumference
Radius

It doesn't matter because they are all proportional to each other. In each case when you work out the ratio either ∏ or the tooth pitch will cancel.
 
It is common in the bike industry to express the ratio as the chain ring size divided by the cluster sprocket size and multiplied by the wheel diameter. If you multiply that by pi, then you have distance traveled per turn of the crank. That is a more meaningful metric.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top