Simple group theory vocabulary issue

JoePhysicsNut
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
I am reading about group theory in particle physics and I'm slightly confused about the word "representation".

Namely, it is sometimes said that the three lightest quarks form a representation of SU(3), or that the three colors do.

But at the same time, it is said that a group can be represented by a set of matrices, which operate on vectors that encode the flavor or color state.

I think it's the operators (ie matrices) that are the representation of a group, not the vectors that get operated on. How can both be a representation of a group when they're different things: operator vs the object that gets operated on?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quite right, the same term representation is used to denote three things.

If we map a group G homomorphically on a group of operators D(G) in a vector space L, we say that the operator group D(G) is a representation of the group G in the representation space L. In particular, we assume the operators are linear. Then if we choose a basis in L, the linear operators of the representation can be described by their matrix representatives.

So the same word "representation" is applied to the mapping, the matrices and the vector space!
 
Bill_K said:
Quite right, the same term representation is used to denote three things.

If we map a group G homomorphically on a group of operators D(G) in a vector space L, we say that the operator group D(G) is a representation of the group G in the representation space L. In particular, we assume the operators are linear. Then if we choose a basis in L, the linear operators of the representation can be described by their matrix representatives.

So the same word "representation" is applied to the mapping, the matrices and the vector space!

Thanks! That cleared it up.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top