Simple Harmonic Motion - basic question

AI Thread Summary
In simple harmonic motion, a mass on a spring returns to its starting position after completing three periods, resulting in a displacement of zero. To calculate the actual distance traveled, one should visualize the mass moving up and down rather than relying solely on equations. By considering the motion in terms of its path, it's clear that the mass travels a total distance equal to six times the amplitude, as it moves to the maximum displacement and back for each half period. The confusion often arises from focusing on the mathematical representation instead of the physical motion. Understanding the concept of distance in this context clarifies the problem significantly.
oakk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A mass on a spring undergoes simple harmonic motion with amplitude A.
a) In a time equal to three periods, what is the magnitude of the displacement of the mass?
b) In a time equal to three periods, what actual distance did it travel?

In the first part, I was at first trying to use an equation but realized that wasn't necessary. If it completes three full periods, it ends up at the same position it started at.

But I don't understand how to calculate the second part. I was trying to use the equation x(t)=Acos(wt) to find the distance traveled, but I don't know t, nor do I know if this is even the right method for solving this. How am I supposed to know the actual distance traveled?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oakk said:
But I don't understand how to calculate the second part. I was trying to use the equation x(t)=Acos(wt) to find the distance traveled, but I don't know t, nor do I know if this is even the right method for solving this. How am I supposed to know the actual distance traveled?
It's simpler than all that. Just imagine the mass bouncing up and down. Start at the top. Where is it? (With respect to the equilibrium position.) After half a period, where is it? How far has it traveled? After 1 period, where is it? And so on.
 
Ah, ok. That makes much more sense. I think my problem is that I wasn't actually envisioning the mass with its simple up/down motion, but rather focusing too much on the sine waves. Thanks!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top