Simple Harmonic Motion: Determine Velocity at t=0.250s

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of a 39.8 g oscillating mass at t=0.250s using the position equation x(t) = (2.00cm)cos(5t - 4.00π). The correct formula for velocity is V_x = -ωA sin(ωt + φ), where the user initially miscalculated the velocity due to unit conversion errors. After clarification, it was noted that the velocity should be expressed in cm/s instead of m/s. The key takeaway is the importance of unit consistency in calculations. Understanding the relationship between velocity and position is crucial for solving harmonic motion problems effectively.
Moe*
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
_{}b]1. Homework Statement [/b)

The position of a 39.8 g oscillating mass is given by the equation x(t)= (2.00cm)cos(5t- 4.00\pi) where t is in seconds. Determine Velocity at t= 0.250s

M= 39.8 g
T= 1.2575 rad/s
K= 9.95e-1 N/m
initial postion= 2 cm

Homework Equations



V_{x}= -\omegaAsin(\omegat + \phi)

The Attempt at a Solution



the attempt i just substitued
V_{x}= -5 rad/s*2sin( 5.00(0.250)-4\pi)... but this didn't work and i don't understand why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
for the the equations posted its supposed to be V subscript x= wAsin(wt + phi) and x(t) = (2.00cm)cos(5t - 4pi)
 
Moe* said:
The position of a 39.8 g oscillating mass is given by the equation x(t)= (2.00cm)cos(5t- 4.00\pi) where t is in seconds. Determine Velocity at t= 0.250s

What is the basic relation connecting velocity and position of any particle? Use that.
 
Moe* said:
_{}b]1. Homework Statement [/b)

The position of a 39.8 g oscillating mass is given by the equation x(t)= (2.00cm)cos(5t- 4.00\pi) where t is in seconds. Determine Velocity at t= 0.250s

M= 39.8 g
T= 1.2575 rad/s
K= 9.95e-1 N/m
initial postion= 2 cm

Homework Equations



V_{x}= -\omegaAsin(\omegat + \phi)

The Attempt at a Solution



the attempt i just substitued
V_{x}= -5 rad/s*2sin( 5.00(0.250)-4\pi)... but this didn't work and i don't understand why?
it seems work to me...
 
Your right it does work, i guess I entered in the wrong units when i answered the question( m/s instead of cm/s).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top