Simple harmonic motion for block of mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a problem involving simple harmonic motion for a mass-spring system, where a block of mass m is displaced from its equilibrium position and released. Initially, the user calculates the time t_1 for the block to return to its original position using the cosine function, resulting in an incorrect factor. It is clarified that the original position refers to the equilibrium position, not the displaced position. The correct solution involves setting the cosine function to zero, leading to the formula t_1 = (pi/2)(m/k)^(1/2). The conversation highlights potential confusion due to the problem's wording.
phazei
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
the problem gives
x(t)= A cos( (k/m)^(1/2) * t)

A block of mass m is attached to a spring whose spring constant is k. The other end of the spring is fixed so that when the spring is unstretched, the mass is located at x=0. View Figure . Assume that the +x direction is to the right.

The mass is now pulled to the right a distance A beyond the equilibrium position and released, at time t=0, with zero initial velocity.

and asks

At what time t_1 does the block come back to its original position for the first time?
Express your answer in terms of k and m.


So when t=0
cos( (k/m)^(1/2) * 0) = 1

so at t_1
cos( (k/m)^(1/2) * t_1) = 1

so
(k/m)^(1/2) * t_1 = 2pi

so t_1 = 2pi(m/k)^(1/2)

but when i submit it it says it's off by a multiplicative factor!

what's wrong with that?

thanks,
adam
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's funky. T=2\pi\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}} is correct as you can easily check.
 
sigh. apparently the original position it was referring to was the equalibrium position, not the position it was initially pulled to.
So cos has to be solved to equal 0.

cos( (k/m)^(1/2) * t) = 0

t_1 = (pi/2)(m/k)^(1/2)

I think the wording is poorly chosen.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top