Simple Harmonic Motion of a plank of mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a problem involving a horizontal plank pivoted at one end and supported by a spring, where the goal is to demonstrate that it exhibits simple harmonic motion with a specific angular frequency. The initial calculations incorrectly included the length L in the expression for angular frequency, leading to confusion about its units. Participants emphasize the importance of relating the vertical displacement x to the angular displacement theta to correctly derive the angular frequency. The correct approach involves recognizing that the small angle approximation allows for simplifications that eliminate L from the final formula. The key takeaway is that the angular frequency should be expressed as omega = square root(3k/m), without the length factor.
Mishy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I don't understand the solution to the following problem:

A horizontal plank of mass m and length L is pivoted at one end. The plank's other end is supported by a spring of force constant k. The moment of inertia of the plank about the pivot is (1/3)m(L^2). The plank is displaced by a small angle theta from its horizontal equilibrium position. Show that it moves with simple harmonic motion with angular frequency omega = square root (3k/m).

Here is my work:
net torque = I[I]*alpha [/I]
net torque = (1/3)m(L^2)*alpha
kxd = (1/3)m(L^2)*(second derivative of theta)
x is the vertical distance from the horizontal equilibrium position.
kxLsin(theta) = (1/3)m(L^2)*(second derivative of theta)
kxL(theta) / (mL^2) = second derivative of theta
because theta is small, sin(theta) = theta
kx(theta)/ mL = second derivative of theta
using this, I would get omega as the square root of (3k/mL)
How do I get rid of that L in my formula for omega? Where was I supposed to drop it?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your formula for angular velocity can't be right because it doesn't have the right units to be an angular velocity. So what did you do wrong?

You have this equation \frac{d^2\theta}{dt^2} = \frac{3 k }{m L} x, but you can't just conclude that everything in front of the x is equal to \omega^2. To see why not, think about the units. What you need to do is relate x to \theta, then try to extract the angular frequency.

Hope this helps.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top