Simple Harmonic Motion on a moving platform

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem related to simple harmonic motion (SHM) on a moving platform. The user correctly identifies the formula for angular frequency as ω=√(k/m) and combines the spring constants for the total spring constant. They seek assistance in determining the amplitude of a mass on a platform moving in SHM described by the equation d(t)=D*cos(10πt). A suggestion is made to find the positions of the endpoints as functions of time to aid in calculating the necessary distances. The conversation emphasizes understanding the relationship between the motion of the platform and the mass's response.
chrisy2012
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I had my physics midterm today and I totally blanked out. I want to know how to solve it for next time.

So In the picture, there are two springs connected to the mass on a platform.
a) if the platform is at rest, find the angular frequency

the expression for angular frequency is :ω=√(k/m), so I just added the two k's and plugged it into k and got :ω=√((k1+k2)/m). Is this correct?

b)The platform then started to move in SHM with the equation d(t)=D*cos10∏t. We had to find the amplitude of mass M. This is where I tripped up and don't know how to solve it. Any ideas?
 

Attachments

  • 1b 2a.png
    1b 2a.png
    3.1 KB · Views: 457
Physics news on Phys.org
hi chrisy2012! :smile:
chrisy2012 said:
the expression for angular frequency is :ω=√(k/m), so I just added the two k's and plugged it into k and got :ω=√((k1+k2)/m). Is this correct?

maybe!

how would you prove it? :wink:
b)The platform then started to move in SHM with the equation d(t)=D*cos10∏t.

find the positions of the two endpoints as functions of t, and that will help you find the distances to multiply by the spring constants :smile:
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top