Simple Harmonic Motion Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a homework problem involving simple harmonic motion, specifically using the equation x = A cos(wt - phi). The user initially calculates time values t1 and t2, assuming a phase angle phi of zero, resulting in an implausible answer of over 40 seconds. Other participants point out that the amplitude (A) is 0.100m and the angular frequency (w) is 1.48 Hz, suggesting that the user's calculations may contain algebraic errors. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in the algebraic steps taken to solve for time, indicating that the logic and physical interpretation of the results are critical. The thread highlights the importance of correctly applying the equations and assumptions in simple harmonic motion problems.
FsLiu
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


316m72x.png

Homework Equations



x = A cos(wt-phi)

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the above equation for t, calculating values for t1 at -0.05 and t2 at 0.05, as well as assuming phase angle phi is zero, I get an answer of over 40 seconds.

I think I may be using the wrong equation or perhaps assuming the value of phi incorrectly. Help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What values are you using for that equation (i.e. what A and omega ['w']) ?
 
zhermes said:
What values are you using for that equation (i.e. what A and omega ['w']) ?

Those are both given in the original question, A=0.100m and w=2pi(period inverse) which turns out to be 1.48 Hz
 
I don't see how you could be getting > 40s; can you show us how you solved for t?
 
zhermes said:
I don't see how you could be getting > 40s; can you show us how you solved for t?

Yeah that's the problem, doesn't make sense logically/physically.

I used the equation x = A cos(wt-phi), assumed phi was zero and rearranged for time, t.

Then I did t1 at -0.05m and t2 at +0.05m and then took the difference as the time taken to go from point one to point 2.
 
There must be something wrong with your algebra, could you show your expressions for t
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top