Simple loop and magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
A regular six-sided polygon loop carrying a steady current generates a magnetic field that can be calculated using the Biot-Savart law. The field at the center of the loop is determined to be B = (6I)/(ca), where 'a' is the side length. At one vertex, the magnetic field is not zero, as contributions from other wire segments must be considered; only the two segments directly attached to the vertex do not contribute. For points at a great distance from the loop, the magnetic field approaches zero, analogous to the behavior of a point charge in electrostatics. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of considering all wire segments when calculating the magnetic field at specific points.
dingo_d
Messages
199
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a regular 6 sided polygon shaped loop through which flows steady current. I have to find the field at the center, at one of the vertex of the polygon and at the great distance from the loop.


Homework Equations



Biot-Savart law:

\vec{B}=\frac{1}{c}I\int\frac{d\vec{\ell}'\times\hat{r}}{r^2}

in CGS units.

The Attempt at a Solution



So I found the field at the center, there is a similar problem in Griffiths. And I got:

B=\frac{6 I}{c a} where a is the length of a side of a polygon. Because the field for a wire is:

B=\frac{I}{cs}(\sin\theta_2-\sin\theta_1), s=a and \theta_2=-\theta_1=\frac{\pi}{6}. And I multiply by 6 because I have 6 sides.

Now I am not sure if this next part is correct and I need some help with it:

At the vertex the field will be 0? Am I correct? Because the element of the wire is in the same direction as the vector from the source (the wire) to the point in which I'm looking at the field (the vertex).

The last part is the confusing one. Now I read that B-S law is sth like Coulomb law, but for currents and magnetostatics, that is it's inverse square law. That means that it falls as I'm getting away from the source.

When I had, in electrostatics, case with uniformly charged sphere when at great distance I'd get the field that is the same as the field for the single point charge.

But what do I get for this? Since it's closed loop, I certainly can't get the answer for infinite wire. Do I get the field of a magnetic field of a circular loop?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first part, I didn't look over it exactly but the method sounds alright. At a vertex, 0 doesn't sound quite right. If you sum up all of the contributions from the different wires you get something into the page. At a great distance, well you have an inverse square relation. What is $\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \frac{C}{x^2}$ for any constant C?
 
Well it's zero, which I though at first, but wasn't really sure.

And for the vertex one I looked only at one vertex and from only one point, so that might be wrong...
 
Yes, the field is 0 very far away.

If you look at the vertex, try considering the effect of each wire segment to the magnetic field to that point. The two segments attached to the vertex won't contribute (if I'm not mistaken), but all of the other segments will.
 
Thanks about this far away part :) I'll try to work that other thing out ^^
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top