Simple manipulation of x^2 - 1 = 0, getting x=0 as a solution.

In summary: Not necessarily. The starting equation is x^2-1 =0, but that doesn't mean that x is always 1 or -1. If you solve the equation you will find that x can also be 0, in which case there is no division by zero. So the statement "Thus we know that x has to be 1 or -1" is incorrect.As for your question, "IF ##\sqrt{x^2 + x + 3}=x##, then ##x=-3##" means that if we assume the equation is true, then we can deduce that x must equal -3. However, this does not mean that x=-3 is a solution of the equation,
  • #36
Crazy Horse 11 said:
Something divided by itself always = 1.

Not true.

x^2 - 1 is no different.

Therefore for example when x=1 then 0/0=1:

(x^2 - 1) / (x^2 - 1) = 1. This may be undefined but it is proved true by the fundamental mentioned above.

Prove that 0 / 0 = 1 is not true.

It's essentially a definition. The division "x/y" is defined for all real (and complex numbers) except for y=0. We have left "x/0" undefined by definition.

The reason is simple. What would we define it as?? You could argue that

[tex]\frac{x^2 - 1}{x^2 - 1}=1[/tex]

for all ##x## except ##1## and ##-1##. So you could say that it makes sense to let this equality hold also for ##1## and ##-1##. That way, we could define ##0/0=1##.
The reason we don't do this, is because we could also argue that for ##x\notin \{1,-1\}## that

[tex]\frac{2(x^2-1)}{x^2-1}=2[/tex]

So we want this to hold also for ##1## and ##-1##. But that forces ##0/0=2##.

In the same way, we could make a perfectly fine argument that ##0/0=r## for any number r! So there is no definition of ##0/0## which unambiguously extends the laws of arithmetic. This is why we define ##0/0## to be undefined.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #37
micromass said:
Not true.



It's essentially a definition. The division "x/y" is defined for all real (and complex numbers) except for y=0. We have left "x/0" undefined by definition.

The reason is simple. What would we define it as?? You could argue that

[tex]\frac{x^2 - 1}{x^2 - 1}=1[/tex]

for all ##x## except ##1## and ##-1##. So you could say that it makes sense to let this equality hold also for ##1## and ##-1##. That way, we could define ##0/0=1##.
The reason we don't do this, is because we could also argue that for ##x\notin \{1,-1\}## that

[tex]\frac{2(x^2-1)}{x^2-1}=2[/tex]

So we want this to hold also for ##1## and ##-1##. But that forces ##0/0=2##.

In the same way, we could make a perfectly fine argument that ##0/0=r## for any number r! So there is no definition of ##0/0## which unambiguously extends the laws of arithmetic. This is why we define ##0/0## to be undefined.

What is your answer for 2(x^2 - 1) / (x^2 - 1) = ?
 
  • #38
Crazy Horse 11 said:
What is your answer for 2(x^2 - 1) / (x^2 - 1) = ?

It is undefined for ##x=1## and ##x=-1##. It is ##2## otherwise.
 
  • #39
micromass said:
It is undefined for ##x=1## and ##x=-1##. It is ##2## otherwise.

2(x^2 - 1) / (x^2 - 1) = x^2 - 1 if x=5 then the answer is 24. If x=1 then the answer = 0. Please show how you got the answer of 2.
 
  • #40
Crazy Horse 11 said:
2(x^2 - 1) / (x^2 - 1) = x^2 - 1 if x=5 then the answer is 24. If x=1 then the answer = 0. Please show how you got the answer of 2.
For all real numbers x except 0, we have x/x=1. This implies that for all real numbers x except 1 and -1, we have
$$\frac{2(x^2-1)}{(x^2-1)}=2\cdot 1=2.$$
 
  • #41
Crazy Horse 11 said:
2(x^2 - 1) / (x^2 - 1) = x^2 - 1 if x=5 then the answer is 24. If x=1 then the answer = 0.

Wut?
 
  • #42
Crazy Horse 11 said:
So you are trying to teach me that 2(3)/3 = 2*1?
Yes, because what you said in post #39 implies that it's not.

Crazy Horse 11 said:
2(x^2 - 1) = x^4 - 2x^2 + 1
This is wrong, but now at least I understand what you're doing wrong. ##2(x^2-1)## doesn't mean what you think it does. It's just the number 2 times the result of ##x^2-1##. It doesn't mean the same thing as ##(x^2-1)^2##.
 
  • #43
Fredrik said:
Yes, because what you said in post #39 implies that it's not.


This is wrong, but now at least I understand what you're doing wrong. ##2(x^2-1)## doesn't mean what you think it does. It's just the number 2 times the result of ##x^2-1##. It doesn't mean the same thing as ##(x^2-1)^2##.

Thank-you for pointing out my oversight.
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
7
Views
495
Replies
1
Views
874
Replies
4
Views
855
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
750
Replies
1
Views
649
Replies
4
Views
414
  • General Math
Replies
19
Views
881
  • General Math
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
664
Back
Top