Simple photometry question with something going wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter maverick280857
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photometry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the calculation of the fraction of detected gamma rays by a detector positioned in front of a point source. It emphasizes that the correct approach involves considering the detector's surface area relative to the total surface area of a sphere, leading to the conclusion that 50% of emitted gamma rays are detected. There is a clarification that multiplying the detected fraction by 0.5 again would yield an incorrect result unless it pertains to detector efficiency. The final formula presented illustrates the relationship between the detector's dimensions and the solid angle for flux detection. Overall, the conversation revolves around ensuring accurate calculations in photometry related to gamma ray detection.
maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
[EDIT] To be deleted.

[EDIT] To be deleted.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
maverick280857 said:
\frac{1}{4\pi x^{2}}\times\pi\frac{d^2}{4}

Therefore the fraction of detected gamma rays is 50% of this fraction

I do not think your reasoning is correct here. You correctly calculate the ratio of the detector surface compared to the total surface of a sphere with diameter x, which is the fraction of detected gamma rays. If the point source is positioned directly in front of the detector, it is a good approximation to consider the detector surface to be as large as half of the total sphere with small diameter. Therefore 50% of the gamma rays will be detected and the 50% emitted in the other direction will not be detected. If you multiply this factor 0.5 again to the ratio of detected gamma rays you calculated before, you consider this factor twice and get a wrong result - unless I misunderstood the problem and the 50% are a measure of detector efficiency, but I do not think so.
 
Thank you for replying.

The 50% controls the fraction of the solid angle over which the detector gets the flux...so its 2*pi*(d/2)^2/(4*pi*x^2) = (d/4x)^2.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top