- #1

phospho

- 251

- 0

let S be the sample space

S = {{HH},{HT},{TH,{TT}}

P(HH|HT,TH,HH) = P(HH n HT,TH,HH)/P(HT,TH,HH) = (1/4 * 3/4) / (3/4) = 1/4

is this correct? I'm finding it hard to determine what the question is actually asking

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter phospho
- Start date

- #1

phospho

- 251

- 0

let S be the sample space

S = {{HH},{HT},{TH,{TT}}

P(HH|HT,TH,HH) = P(HH n HT,TH,HH)/P(HT,TH,HH) = (1/4 * 3/4) / (3/4) = 1/4

is this correct? I'm finding it hard to determine what the question is actually asking

- #2

Ray Vickson

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Dearly Missed

- 10,706

- 1,722

let S be the sample space

S = {{HH},{HT},{TH,{TT}}

P(HH|HT,TH,HH) = P(HH n HT,TH,HH)/P(HT,TH,HH) = (1/4 * 3/4) / (3/4) = 1/4

is this correct? I'm finding it hard to determine what the question is actually asking

Think about what the question says: what is the conditional probability of two heads if you are told you get at least one head? The information you are told eliminates one or more of the original sample points; can you say which sample point (or points) is (or are) eliminated? For the points that remain, what are the new, adjusted, probabilities?

- #3

- 17,920

- 10,153

What are the odds that two coin tosses in a row will result in two heads?

What are the odds that two coin tosses in a row will result in two heads if you add the condition that it is known that one of the tosses results in a head?

- #4

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 43,021

- 970

- #5

- 38,454

- 7,965

You appear to have evaluated P(HH n HT,TH,HH) as P(HH)*P(HT,TH,HH). The two are not independent, so you cannot multiply their probabilities. Indeed, one is a subset of the other, so P(HH n HT,TH,HH) = P(HH).P(HH n HT,TH,HH)/P(HT,TH,HH) = (1/4 * 3/4) / (3/4)

- #6

phospho

- 251

- 0

so it's 1/3?

- #7

- 17,920

- 10,153

so it's 1/3?

That's not what I get.

- #8

phospho

- 251

- 0

That's not what I get.

here is my working:

P(HH|HT,TH,HH) = P(HH)/P(HT,TH,HH) = (1/4)/(3/4) = 1/3

- #9

- 17,920

- 10,153

H/H

H/T

T/H

H/H

the two HH's are NOT the same. They are the same only if you are looking for COMBINATIONS, not probabilities.

- #10

Ray Vickson

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Dearly Missed

- 10,706

- 1,722

H/H

H/T

T/H

H/H

the two HH's are NOT the same. They are the same only if you are looking for COMBINATIONS, not probabilities.

Every probability book I have ever seen would say there is just one HH if the coins are undistinguished (i.e., maybe distinguishable, but we don't bother to do it). You *would* be correct if you distinguished between the two coins, say one is red and the other is blue. Then the sample space would be {(RH,BH),(BH,RH),(RH,BT),(BH,RT),(RT,BH),(BT,RH),(BT,RT),(RT,BT)}, with (presumably) each sample point (i,j) having probability 1/8. One could then work the problem for this representation, but the final answer would be the same as in the simpler, undistinguished case.

- #11

- 17,920

- 10,153

Every probability book I have ever seen would say there is just one HH if the coins are undistinguished (i.e., maybe distinguishable, but we don't bother to do it). You *would* be correct if you distinguished between the two coins, say one is red and the other is blue.

But you CAN, and I believe MUST, distinguish between the coins. One is tossed first and the other is tossed second, and this gives 4 outcomes, as I stated.

- #12

Ray Vickson

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Dearly Missed

- 10,706

- 1,722

But you CAN, and I believe MUST, distinguish between the coins. One is tossed first and the other is tossed second, and this gives 4 outcomes, as I stated.

But that is related to what I said in my post. You have 8 (NOT 4) equally-likely outcomes. I listed them all. You cannot just distinguish between head #1 and head #2 and ignore all the others: you also need to distinguish between, eg., head#1 and tail#2, head #2 and tail #1, tail #1 and tail #2, etc., etc.

- #13

- 17,920

- 10,153

But that is related to what I said in my post. You have 8 (NOT 4) equally-likely outcomes. I listed them all. You cannot just distinguish between head #1 and head #2 and ignore all the others: you also need to distinguish between, eg., head#1 and tail#2, head #2 and tail #1, tail #1 and tail #2, etc., etc.

No, I don't think so. There is a pre-condition that at least one of the coins has a head, so you CANNOT have tail #1 and tail #2. It's ruled out.

- #14

Ray Vickson

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Dearly Missed

- 10,706

- 1,722

No, I don't think so. There is a pre-condition that at least one of the coins has a head, so you CANNOT have tail #1 and tail #2. It's ruled out.

Yes, I know that. I start with the

- #15

- 17,920

- 10,153

OK, I see the error of my ways ... it's 1/3

Thanks

Thanks

Share:

- Replies
- 15

- Views
- 161

- Last Post

- Replies
- 22

- Views
- 678

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 379

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 422

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 370

- Last Post

- Replies
- 10

- Views
- 871

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 108

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 499

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 570

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 233