Simple question about definition of Mutual Inductance

AI Thread Summary
Mutual inductance quantifies how the magnetic field of one coil induces voltage in another coil, reflecting their interdependence. The formula for mutual inductance, L_{12}, incorporates the number of turns in the second coil (N_2), the current in the first coil (I_1), and the magnetic field (B_1) from the first coil integrated over the area of the second coil. The discussion clarifies that while self-inductance relates to a coil's own magnetic field, mutual inductance involves the interaction between two coils. The Reciprocity Theorem states that mutual inductance is symmetric, meaning M_{12} equals M_{21}. Understanding these concepts is essential for accurately calculating mutual inductance in various coil configurations.
Lomion
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I'm getting confused over the formal definition of mutual inductance. I've googled and searched a lot of sites, but I still don't understand, so I'm hoping someone here can explain it to me in plain English!

In our lecture, this was the formula given for mutual inductance:

L_{12} = \frac{N_2}{I_1} \oint_{s_2} B_1 dS_2

According to my own interpretation, this means that the inductance at the second coil due to the first coil (L 1 on 2) is essentially:

The flux caused by B_1 from the first coil passing through the area of the second coil. \Phi_{12} = B_1 A_2 (assuming B constant to make life simpler). And this flux is linked to the N2 turns of the second coil, and divided by the current from the first coil.

Does this make any sense? My textbook doesn't explain this at all (and in fact, doesn't even have this formula! Argh!) so I used Schaum's outline, but it seems to give me something different.

In example 4 from Schaum's Outline (Ch. 11) in case anyone here has it, it has two concentric coils. First, it calculated the B in the first coil. Then it calculated \Phi = B_1 A_1. (See how it differs from the definition above?)

And then it said M_{12} = N_2 \frac{\Phi}{I_1}.

Can someone please clarify why this is? And if I'm using the correct formulas at all?

A better explanation of what exactly is going on with mutual inductance would be appreciated as well!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right when you say that mutual inductance is due to change in flux linking circuit A when the flux lines are from circuit B (and vice versa).

If I read correctly you have written a relationship involving the net flux linking a circuit due to the emf induced by the change in current in the circuit itself. This is not mutual inductance. It is self inductance. The self inductance coefficient is normally denoted by L. For mutual inductance we use M. Of course you mean L12 so I guess you mean the same thing.

The Flux linking circuit 1 is due to the B field set up by circuit 2. So the flux linking ckt 1 is

\oint_{ckt 1} \vec{B_{2}}dS

This must equal the net flux linkage of circuit 1, i.e. N_{1}\phi_{B,1} = M_{12}I_{1}.

There is an important theorem governing Mutual Inductance: it is called the Reciprocity Theorem. It simply states that M_{12} = M_{21}. The implications of this thorem are quite interesting. As an example if you are given a long solenoid and a finite length solenoid such that the short solenoid is inside the long solenoid and there is a current I running through it: you have to find M for the system. Can you see how the reciprocity theorem helps? The above relationships completely answer this question.

If you want to read more (I am sorry are you referring to Edminster Schaum?) you might want to get hold of Classical Electrodynamics by Griffiths.

Cheers
vivek
 
Last edited:


Mutual inductance is a measure of the relationship between two coils in an electrical circuit. It describes how the changing magnetic field of one coil induces a voltage in the other coil. In simpler terms, it is the ability of one coil to influence the current in another coil.

In the formula given for mutual inductance, L_{12}, N_2 represents the number of turns in the second coil and I_1 represents the current flowing through the first coil. The integral symbol, \oint, represents the integration over a closed surface, s_2, which is the area of the second coil. This integration takes into account the varying magnetic field, B_1, from the first coil passing through the surface of the second coil. This flux, \Phi_{12}, is then divided by the current in the first coil, I_1, to give the mutual inductance, L_{12}.

In the case of the example from Schaum's Outline, the formula used is slightly different because it is for a concentric coil configuration. In this case, the magnetic field from the first coil is assumed to be constant, so the flux, \Phi, is simply calculated by multiplying the magnetic field by the surface area of the coil, \Phi = B_1 A_1. The mutual inductance, M_{12}, is then calculated by multiplying the number of turns in the second coil, N_2, by the flux, \Phi, and dividing by the current in the first coil, I_1.

In summary, mutual inductance is a measure of the relationship between two coils and is calculated by taking into account the magnetic field, number of turns, and current in the two coils. The specific formula used may vary depending on the configuration of the coils.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top