Understanding Relativity: An Introduction for A-Level Students

  • Thread starter Thread starter Al3ks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
Al3ks
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm no scientist but I am learning A-level Maths and Physics, so if there is mathematics involved try not to make it too advanced. Thank You!

If you have a mass (A) in one frame of reference (1) and it is staionary in this frame and is weighed and has a certain mass (x). There is another frame of reference (2) and frame 1 is moving relative to frame 2. If mass A is slowed down to being stationary in frame 2 and is then weighed to give a mass (y) is mass x larger than mass y due to the kinetic energy adding mass? (assume accurate enough instruments or large enough velocities, etc. to make this noticeable)

Thanks
Alex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
x=y.

That is, the mass as measured when the object is stationary in their reference frame is the same. This mass is known as the rest mass of the object (For obvious reasons).
 
OK thanks and if mass y were measured from frame 1 x < y? and vice versa?
 
That's right. The "mass" of the object measured when it is in a different inertial frame is always larger than the rest mass.

Note that physicists generally don't like to say the mass has changed at all, as it is quite confusing. Usually, we refer only to the rest mass of the object and we say that the energy has changed.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top