Simple ratios dilemma; telescopes and signals from out of space

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the power incident on a radio telescope with a diameter of 1000 feet, which is claimed to detect a signal of one picowatt across the Earth's surface. The initial calculation incorrectly uses the total surface area of the Earth instead of the appropriate cross-sectional area. The correct approach should apply the cross-sectional area formula, leading to a revised power calculation. The participant acknowledges the mistake after receiving clarification. The conversation highlights the importance of using the correct geometric parameters in such calculations.
T7
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Here's the question:

a) There is a radio telescope that is 1000 feet in diameter. It is claimed that it can detect a signal that lays down on the entire surface of the Earth a power of only one picowatt. What power would be incident on the antenna in this case?


It seems to me that this can be solved simply by considering the ratio of the surface area of the Earth to the power of the signal, and applying that to the surface of the telescope.

As far as I can see, given radius of Earth = 6.37 x 10E6 m and 1 foot = 0.3048m,

{ [ 1 x 10E-12 ] / [ 4 x pi x (6.37x10E6)^2 ] } x [ pi x (1/2 * 1000 * 0.3048)^2 ]

would give the answer. It actually gives 1.43 x 10E-22 when what is required is 5.6 x 10E-22 (4 times larger).

Can anyone spot what I'm doing wrong?

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are using the total surface area of the entire Earth (4\pi r^2), when you should only be using the cross-sectional area of the Earth (\pi r^2).
 
Tom Mattson said:
You are using the total surface area of the entire Earth (4\pi r^2), when you should only be using the cross-sectional area of the Earth (\pi r^2).

Yep. Thanks. :)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top