Simple relativistic harmonic oscillator

photonist
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
In the attached file, I have formulated a simple one dimensional harmonic oscillator and solved the model numerically. Such a model might represent a simple reaction coordinate along which a liquid drop actinide nucleus might split after absorbing a neutron. Clearly the complete model involves multiple modes and highly non-linear behaviour of the Hook's Law spring constant. But at least the approach this problem seems relatively simple.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, photonist,

Welcome to PF!

Cool idea! However, I don't think the nuclear-physics application is right.

Fist off, the mass parameter is not going to be the mass defect. This kind of thing is generically known as an "inertial parameter" in nuclear physics, and it is very difficult to calculate. There are various approximations that can be written down for them, based on, e.g., low-amplitude oscillations of a classical, nonviscous liquid drop. But in reality, these approximations are only good to within about an order of magnitude. One reason is that nuclei are superfluid in the ground states. The only thing that really *is* straightforward to calculate is the inertial parameter after scission, which is just what you would expect classically for two separate bodies.

In the case of spontaneous fission, the order-of-magnitude theoretical uncertainty in the inertial parameter swamps any relativistic corrections. The relativistic corrections are quite small, since the fragments are not highly relativistic.

In addition, the anharmonicities are huge, especially when you're talking about fission (as opposed to a simple vibration of the nuclear shape about its equilibrium). Also it's a quantum-mechanical system, not a classical one. And nuclear vibrations at small amplitudes are typically not very highly collective, which means that it isn't really very accurate to think of them as pure shape oscillations; they're more like somewhat coherent superpositions of some small number of different single-particle excitations.

-Ben
 
HI Ben:
Thanks for your comments. Generally I agree with you--for one thing, the motion I posit is too simple.

However, the problem is interesting considering that fission in the odd actinides is occasioned by a thermal neutron--the energy gain is tremendous!

It is true that the droplet can be considered a superfluid and the Hook's Law constant is a measure of the separation of the neutron and proton fluid sub-components. But even so, when the thermal neutron is absorbed there has to be a path along a reaction coordinate (just as in chemical kinetics) established from the chaotic motion. A better approach would be to consider just how that is accomplished.

But the reason I looked into this problem was not to contribute to the liquid drop model, but rather to establish for myself a coherent special relativistic account of the harmonic oscillator problem to correct errors I found on the web. The liquid drop model appeared to be a possible case where the oscillator model would apply.

The novel feature of increasing odd harmonics as the maximum potential energy approaches the 'rest' energy suggests a decomposition mode. As the ratio approaches 1, the motion becomes 'unbound' (subject to the caveats mentioned).

Curious.
 
Ben:

You've pretty much disposed of fission as a potential candidate for my relativistic harmonic oscillator. There is of course plenty of MeV physics for which such analysis might be useful.

But what about a strongly optically dispersive medium on the short/long wavelength side of the absorption/gain line in which the refractive index can become really large. In effect the speed of light within a certain bandwidth will be greatly slowed. If that were the case, then harmonic oscillator radiators might exhibit 'relativistic' effects based on the local speed of light.
 
photonist said:
Ben:

You've pretty much disposed of fission as a potential candidate for my relativistic harmonic oscillator. There is of course plenty of MeV physics for which such analysis might be useful.

But what about a strongly optically dispersive medium on the short/long wavelength side of the absorption/gain line in which the refractive index can become really large. In effect the speed of light within a certain bandwidth will be greatly slowed. If that were the case, then harmonic oscillator radiators might exhibit 'relativistic' effects based on the local speed of light.

The c in relativity doesn't change based on the index of refraction of a medium.

You might be interested in this:

http://gregegan.customer.netspace.net.au/SCIENCE/Rindler/SimpleElasticity.html
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top