Simplification of a logical equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter momentum
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
momentum
Messages
111
Reaction score
0
Member advised to use the formatting template for all homework help requests
here is what my book has given for simplification.

ukMZQ2W.jpg

US2rt2Q.jpg


I'm not clear with that red marked part in the given solution. How come they got two same items in that red box ?

However, my solution is different
mqJSf8w.jpg
 

Attachments

  • ukMZQ2W.jpg
    ukMZQ2W.jpg
    8.4 KB · Views: 787
  • US2rt2Q.jpg
    US2rt2Q.jpg
    4 KB · Views: 785
  • mqJSf8w.jpg
    mqJSf8w.jpg
    9.2 KB · Views: 678
Physics news on Phys.org
BvU said:
X'Y = X'Y + X'Y : the truth tables left and right are identical ...
Is it a Law ? which Law is this ?
 
Occasionally, it aids simplification if you first introduce an extra term without changing anything. Just as in algebra you can replace B by 1× B, or by (B + 0) or by B×W/W, then in Boolean algebra you can replace A by A + A or by A•True.

Now, in your cited example I can see no reason for doing this where they have. I expected the author was going to perform some neat move, but he doesn't. He just causes a couple of extra unnecessary lines, before using the fact that A + A’ B is equivalent to A + B.

This is something you should commit to memory, it comes in very handy. Demonstrate it using a Truth Table before trying to prove it using rules of Boolean algebra.

Apply this to further simplify the terms in your solution that you have circled: x’ y’ + x’ y z