Simplify the following expression

I think I was looking at an old trig identity sheet in the past and saw that, but I never did remember it for some reason. :PIn summary, the conversation discusses a problem involving simplifying an expression with nested radicals. The participants attempt to find a simpler expression, but ultimately conclude that there is no simple solution. They also discuss the difficulty of finding a solution without knowing the end goal. Finally, they mention a similar expression involving trigonometric identities.
  • #1
tahayassen
270
1

Homework Statement



http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/88/71893688.png

Homework Equations



Not applicable.

The Attempt at a Solution



http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/846/14479081.png

I'm already stuck! I calculated both expressions and they don't equal each other. :(
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Actually, don't bother helping me with this one. I think I've figured out. I needed to find the LCD between the two fractions.

Instead, answer this: why can't I take the square root of a binomial?

edit: I'm stuck again with this question. I can't seem to get rid of the large radical even after I combine the fractions. :(
 
  • #3
You can't do that because generally,

[tex]\sqrt{a+b}\neq \sqrt{a}+\sqrt{b}[/tex]

And if you want to see why, if these are equal, then their squares must be equal. Try squaring both sides and see what happens.

This is one of those problems that unless you know where you're going, it's going to be difficult finding your way there. I tried a few things out but I don't see the radicals being simplified. I believe the only way to simplify this expression is to take a common denominator and then take a factor of 4 in the denominator out of the larger surd.
 
  • #4
Wolfram comes up with a nice one:
$$
\frac 1 2 \sqrt{2 + \sqrt{2 - \sqrt 3}}
$$

Beyond that I also believe there's not much that is useful to simplify.
 
  • #5
I like Serena said:
Wolfram comes up with a nice one:
$$
\frac 1 2 \sqrt{2 + \sqrt{2 - \sqrt 3}}
$$

If you consider further nested roots as being simpler, then sure :tongue:

I made a futile attempt to see if the larger surd can be removed by trying to find if there exist integers a,b,c,d to the following equality:

[tex]\left(a+b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}+d\sqrt{6}\right)^2= \sqrt{6} -\sqrt{2}+4[/tex]

but to my amazement (not really, I was expecting it) to figure this out, one would need to solve these non-linear simultaneous equations:

[tex]a^2+2b^2+3c^2+6d^2=4[/tex]
[tex]ab+3cd=\frac{-1}{2}[/tex]
[tex]ac+2bd=0[/tex]
[tex]ad+bc=\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

And I haven't a clue how to proceed - plus I'm not really feeling up for the challenge considering its pretty unlikely that the variables are all in fact integers.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Mentallic said:
If you consider further nested roots as being simpler, then sure

Less work to type into a calculator. :biggrin:
And it looks nice!


And I haven't a clue how to proceed - plus I'm not really feeling up for the challenge considering its pretty unlikely that the variables are all in fact integers.

Neither have I, but if you do proceed, please swap the signs of the 2nd and 4th line. ;)
 
  • #7
I'm pretty sure there's no way to make that surd much simpler in any meaningful sense.
 
  • #8
I like Serena said:
Less work to type into a calculator. :biggrin:
And it looks nice!
Agreed, it looks pretty sweet!


I like Serena said:
Neither have I, but if you do proceed, please swap the signs of the 2nd and 4th line. ;)

Uhh... How I managed to transcribe that incorrectly I'll never know :yuck:
 
  • #9
Mentallic said:
If you consider further nested roots as being simpler, then sure :tongue:

I made a futile attempt to see if the larger surd can be removed by trying to find if there exist integers a,b,c,d to the following equality:

[tex]\left(a+b\sqrt{2}+c\sqrt{3}+d\sqrt{6}\right)^2= \sqrt{6} -\sqrt{2}+4[/tex]

but to my amazement (not really, I was expecting it) to figure this out, one would need to solve these non-linear simultaneous equations:

[tex]a^2+2b^2+3c^2+4d^2=4[/tex]
[tex]ab+3cd=\frac{-1}{2}[/tex]
[tex]ac+2bd=0[/tex]
[tex]ad+bc=\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

And I haven't a clue how to proceed - plus I'm not really feeling up for the challenge considering its pretty unlikely that the variables are all in fact integers.

Well, this is probably not what is wanted in high-school or first-year college, but one _can_ get a solution using Groebner bases. Here is what happens in Maple 14:
sys:={a^2+2*b^2+3*c^2+4*d^2-4,2*a*b+6*c*d+1,a*c+2*b*d,2*a*d+2*b*c-1};
with(Groebner);

B:=Basis(sys,plex(a,b,c,d));
B := [1-256*d^2+19072*d^4-626560*d^6+10231872*d^8-85606400*d^10+351143936*d^12-621502464*d^14+359817216*d^16,

58700876744*d-6772491730030*d^3+516306245937248*d^5-16676091040182256*d^7+214982693609933568*d^9-1128998897071871232*d^11+2264133466874087424*d^13-1391829359823378432*d^15+5466782401*a,

20794688424*d-25887729161344*d^3+1613081383661048*d^5-35738765248743936*d^7+355188616828494592*d^9-1606762324171226112*d^11+2991485535250916352*d^13-1775184867367059456*d^15+5466782401*b,

127738358584*d-36353540383530*d^3+2108143299164768*d^5-47032277980064368*d^7+476144844758761728*d^9-2186167800738890496*d^11+4105190085058529280*d^13-2446662083621640192*d^15+5466782401*c]

So, d is one of the roots of the 16th degree polynomial in B[1]; then we can get a, b and c by setting B[2], B[3] and B[4] to zero. See? Nothing to it!

RGV
 
  • #10
Well, all roots of B[1] appear to be irrational (according to Wolfram), so I don't think we get a nice simplification. ;)
 
  • #11
Look at various ways to express [itex]\displaystyle\cos\left(\frac{5\pi}{24}\right)\,, [/itex] and/or [itex]\displaystyle\sin\left(\frac{7\pi}{24}\right)\,. [/itex]
 
  • #12
Nice! However did you find that one?
 
  • #13
I like Serena said:
Nice! However did you find that one?
It reminded me of a problem I used to give students in which they were to find [itex]\displaystyle\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{12}\right)\,,[/itex] using both angle subtraction and half angle identities.

(I then had them give the approximate numerical answer to each -- mostly so they could see that the two different looking answers were equivalent.)

So I played around with that a bit for the problem in this thread.
 
  • #14
I went a little nuts with this problem and got...

[itex]\frac{(6(√6-√2)+24)\sqrt{6(√6-√2)+24}}{√48(6(√6-√2)+24)}[/itex]

Are radicals still considered nested if they're within parentheses?

edit: they would be since you could just distribute in the 6, oh well.
 
  • #15
Ray Vickson said:
Well, this is probably not what is wanted in high-school or first-year college, but one _can_ get a solution using Groebner bases. Here is what happens in Maple 14:
sys:={a^2+2*b^2+3*c^2+4*d^2-4,2*a*b+6*c*d+1,a*c+2*b*d,2*a*d+2*b*c-1};
with(Groebner);
Could you try this again but with
sys:={a^2+2*b^2+3*c^2+6*d^2-4,2*a*b+6*c*d+1,a*c+2*b*d,2*a*d+2*b*c-1};

Ray Vickson said:
So, d is one of the roots of the 16th degree polynomial in B[1]; then we can get a, b and c by setting B[2], B[3] and B[4] to zero. See? Nothing to it!
What a relief! :biggrin:
SammyS said:
Look at various ways to express [itex]\displaystyle\cos\left(\frac{5\pi}{24}\right)\,, [/itex] and/or [itex]\displaystyle\sin\left(\frac{7\pi}{24}\right)\,. [/itex]
Mentallic said:
This is one of those problems that unless you know where you're going, it's going to be difficult finding your way there.

Ahh yes that's where I remember seeing something similar to the expression [tex]\frac{\sqrt{6}-\sqrt{2}}{8}[/tex]
Thanks for reminding me.
 

1. What does it mean to "simplify" an expression?

Simplifying an expression means to reduce it to its simplest form by combining like terms, removing parentheses, and using order of operations.

2. Why is it important to simplify expressions?

Simplifying expressions can help make them easier to understand and work with, as well as identify any errors or mistakes in the original expression.

3. How do I know when an expression is simplified?

An expression is simplified when there are no more like terms that can be combined, all parentheses have been removed, and the expression follows the correct order of operations.

4. What are the steps to simplify an expression?

The steps to simplify an expression include: 1. Combine like terms, 2. Use the distributive property, if necessary, 3. Remove parentheses, 4. Use the correct order of operations, and 5. Simplify any remaining terms.

5. Can all expressions be simplified?

No, not all expressions can be simplified. Some expressions may already be in their simplest form or may require more advanced mathematical techniques to simplify.

Similar threads

  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
759
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
768
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top