Simplifying a series with the ratio test

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the convergence or divergence of the series ∑_1^∞ (2)(4)(6)...(2n)/n!. Participants explore the application of the ratio test and the simplification of the series.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the simplification of the series and the application of the ratio test. Questions arise regarding the correctness of the limit calculation and the interpretation of the results. Some participants express confusion about the steps taken in the ratio test.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the ratio test and its application. Some participants have provided insights into potential errors in calculations, while others have noted the direct observation that the nth term does not approach zero, suggesting divergence. However, no consensus has been reached on the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the types of assistance they can provide. There is also a discussion about the appropriateness of different convergence tests.

MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


Determine if the following series is divergent or convergent:

## ∑_1^∞ \frac {(2)(4)(6)...(2n)}{n!} ##


2. The attempt at a solution

I understand this can be simplified to:

## ∑_1^∞ \frac {(2^n)(n!)}{n!} ##
This can easily be seen to be divergent.

But when I do ## lim_{n→∞}\frac {a_{n+1}}{a_{n}} = lim_{n→∞}\frac {1}{n} ## after simplifying. Does anyone know what I may be doing wrong or why this is not appropriate? Is there any restriction on when the ratio test can be used? Thank you! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MathewsMD said:
But when I do ## lim_{n→∞}\frac {a_{n+1}}{a_{n}} = lim_{n→∞}\frac {1}{n} ## after simplifying.

How did you get that? (It is wrong).
 
AlephZero said:
How did you get that? (It is wrong).

I know ## a_n = \frac {(2)(4)(6)...(2n)}{n!} ##
So ##\frac {a_{n+1}}{a_n} = [\frac {(2)(4)(6)...(2(n+1))}{(n+1)!}] [\frac {n!}{(2)(4)(6)...(2n)}]##
This simplifies to: ## \frac {2(n+1)}{2n} \frac {1}{n+1}##

Now, when the limit is taken as n→∞, then ## \frac {2(n+1)}{2n} = 1## and you're left with ##lim_{n→∞}\frac {1}{n+1} ## I just simplified this to ##\frac {1}{n}##. Does anyone mind telling me what I did wrong here?
 
MathewsMD said:
I know ## a_n = \frac {(2)(4)(6)...(2n)}{n!} ##
So ##\frac {a_{n+1}}{a_n} = [\frac {(2)(4)(6)...(2(n+1))}{(n+1)!}] [\frac {n!}{(2)(4)(6)...(2n)}]##
This simplifies to: ## \frac {2(n+1)}{2n} \frac {1}{n+1}##

Now, when the limit is taken as n→∞, then ## \frac {2(n+1)}{2n} = 1## and you're left with ##lim_{n→∞}\frac {1}{n+1} ## I just simplified this to ##\frac {1}{n}##. Does anyone mind telling me what I did wrong here?

No, the ratio is 2(n+1)/(n+1)=2. Where did the extra n come from??
 
Dick said:
No, the ratio is 2(n+1)/(n+1)=2. Where did the extra n come from??

ahh i forgot to cancel a 2n
 
MathewsMD said:

Homework Statement


Determine if the following series is divergent or convergent:

## ∑_1^∞ \frac {(2)(4)(6)...(2n)}{n!} ##


2. The attempt at a solution

I understand this can be simplified to:

## ∑_1^∞ \frac {(2^n)(n!)}{n!} ##
This can easily be seen to be divergent.

But when I do ## lim_{n→∞}\frac {a_{n+1}}{a_{n}} = lim_{n→∞}\frac {1}{n} ## after simplifying. Does anyone know what I may be doing wrong or why this is not appropriate? Is there any restriction on when the ratio test can be used? Thank you! :)

Why bother with the ratio test? The nth term of the series equals ##2^n## (as you have already noted). Since ##2^n## does not go to 0 as ##n \to \infty## the series cannot possibly converge.
 
Ray Vickson said:
Why bother with the ratio test? The nth term of the series equals ##2^n## (as you have already noted). Since ##2^n## does not go to 0 as ##n \to \infty## the series cannot possibly converge.

Yep, I just didn't know why using a different test that I wasn't getting the same solution. Problem's solved.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K