Simplifying Argument of Dirac Delta for Reexpressing a Dirac Delta

CAF123
Gold Member
Messages
2,918
Reaction score
87

Homework Statement


Show that $$\delta(k^2) \delta[(k-q_2)^2] = \delta(k^2) \delta(k^0 - \sqrt{s}/2) \frac{1}{2\sqrt{s}},$$ where ##k = (k^0, \mathbf k)## and ##s = q_2^2,## where ##q_2 = (\sqrt{s},\mathbf 0)##

2. Homework Equations

I was going to use the fact that $$\delta(f(x)) = \sum \frac{\delta(x-a_i)}{|f'(a_i)|},$$ where the ##a_i## are such that ##f(a_i)=0##.

3. The Attempt at a Solution

In this case let ##f = (k-q_2)^2 = k^2 - 2k \cdot q_2 + q_2^2## where ##\cdot## is the inner product of two four vectors. Then using the explicit four vector expressions I get ##{k^0}^2 - |\mathbf k|^2 - 2k^0 \sqrt{s} + s = 0 \Rightarrow k^0 = \sqrt{s} \pm |\mathbf k|,## which would imply I have a term ##\delta(k^0 - (\sqrt{s} + |\mathbf k|))## but this is not matching with what is given. The calculation is computed in the centre of momentum frame, hence the form of the four vectors. Can anyone help? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can simplify the argument of ##\delta[(k-q_2)^2]## using the constraint from the factor of ##\delta[k^2]=\delta[(k^0)^2 - |\mathbf k|^2]##. It is most convenient to use this before you compute the root.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top