Simplying a problem with decimals and exponents

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anna Blanksch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponents
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves simplifying an expression that includes decimals and exponents, specifically (2.5 x 10^24)(4.5 x 10^-9) / (3 x 10^4). The discussion centers around the rules for manipulating numbers in scientific notation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the rules for adding and subtracting exponents when multiplying and dividing numbers in scientific notation. There is an exploration of how to separate the components of the expression for simplification. Questions arise about terminology, such as whether to refer to the numbers as "base ten numbers" or "base ten exponents."

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem by suggesting a method to split the expression into manageable parts. There is an ongoing exploration of the terminology used in the context of scientific notation and the properties of multiplication.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the correct terminology for the components of the expression and the mathematical properties being applied. There is a mention of the associative property in multiplication as relevant to the discussion.

Anna Blanksch
Gold Member
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

(2.5 x 10^24)(4.5 x 10^-9) / (3 x 10^4)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I know that when multiplying base ten numbers with exponents you add the exponents (ie: 10^2 x 10^3 = 10^5) ad that when dividing, the exponents are subtracted. I'm not sure what my first step would be towards simplifying this equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anna Blanksch said:
1. Homework Statement

(2.5 x 10^24)(4.5 x 10^-9) / (3 x 10^4)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I know that when multiplying base ten numbers with exponents you add the exponents (ie: 10^2 x 10^3 = 10^5) ad that when dividing, the exponents are subtracted. I'm not sure what my first step would be towards simplifying this equation.

Split it into ((2.5 x 4.5)/3) x ((10^24 x 10^(-9))/10^4). Use your exponent rules on the second factor and a calculator on the first factor.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Anna Blanksch
Great! Thanks for your help. Is there a rule/title for the process of converting from the original problem to the way that you split it (separating the base ten numbers)? Also, am I calling those the right thing? Base ten numbers? Should they be called, "base ten exponents"? The answer I got is 3.75 x 10^11. Close? Right on? Thanks again so much for your quick reply!
 
Anna Blanksch said:
Great! Thanks for your help. Is there a rule/title for the process of converting from the original problem to the way that you split it (separating the base ten numbers)? Also, am I calling those the right thing? Base ten numbers? Should they be called, "base ten exponents"? The answer I got is 3.75 x 10^11. Close? Right on? Thanks again so much for your quick reply!

Right on. I call them "powers of ten", and I don't think it has a name. It's just separating the powers of ten from the other numbers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Anna Blanksch
Anna Blanksch said:
Is there a rule/title for the process of converting from the original problem to the way that you split it (separating the base ten numbers)?

What you are seeing is an application of the associative property in multiplication:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associative_property

You can use this property to group strings of numbers being multiplied together into more convenient arrangements.

For example:

(2 * 3) * 4 = 2 * (3 * 4) or
(2 * 103) * (4 * 102) = (2 * 4) * (103 * 102) = 8 * 105
 
Poor Anna, in the middle of nitpicking nerds !

I can't resist to point at the sentence "Associativity is not to be confused with commutativity, which addresses whether a × b = b × a." in his majesty's link. However, you need it to get from where you were to where you want to be.

If you go on in maths or physics this kind of attention to detail is essential; for the rest of the world it's just a good idea :)
 
It's learning the simple things which seems to be overlooked nowadays. Everybody wants to split the atom; nobody wants to learn to use a hammer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K