B Simultaneity in Special Relativity: Examining the Theory

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter MartinWyckmans
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simultaneity
MartinWyckmans
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Thanks for opening the millionth thread about this. My teacher has been explaining special relativity and I became confused at simultaneity.
This is my train of thought, where did I go wrong?

Say a sensor is moving at a speed of c-1 m/s to the right. Somewhere to the left of the sensor there's a wall with a small opening. 2 balls fall down behind the wall and the distance between the balls is 1 meter, and when they pass the small opening the ray of light that gets reflected by the ball gets sent through the opening. The ray of light moves to the right, towards the sensor, with a speed of c. Taking the sensor as point of view, the light travels towards the sensor with 1 m/s. If the second ray of light coming from the second ball hits the sensor 1 second later than the first sensor, then the rays of light began traveling at the same time and the balls would fall simultaneously. In other words, if \Delta t = \Delta x / (c-v) with \Delta t the time difference measured in the sensor, then the actions happen simultaneously.
And say the sensor is moving towards the wall/balls/ray of light, then the formula would be \Delta t = \Delta x / (c+v)
My teacher dismissed my question almost immediately because he said (c+v) is impossible, but I'm not saying the sensor is traveling with a speed that's (c+v). Is it still wrong?

I don't know if I've made myself very clear, so maybe an analogy works better.

Say there're 3 ancient cities; Sparta, Athens and Rome. One day, a messager from Athens visits Sparta, saying the city has been sacked. Two days later, a messager from Rome visits Sparta, saying Rome has been sacked. The Spartans are fearful and wonder whether the same empire sacked both cities. They know that the distance between Sparta and Athens is 200 kilometers and the distance between Sparta and Rome is 600 kilometers. The messagers are trained to run 200 kilometers each day. The time between the two messagers was 2 days. Calculating the time difference with the formula: \Delta t = \Delta x / v 2 = 400 / 200 and we see that the time difference is indeed 2 days.

Does this not apply in special relativity? I know that getting the right velocity v would be very difficult to really use, but is this how it theoretically works?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!
MartinWyckmans said:
... the distance between the balls is 1 meter...
In which frame of reference? Distance is relative.
MartinWyckmans said:
...the light travels towards the sensor with 1 m/s.
The light travels toward the sensor at speed c, the speed of light is c in every inertial frame of reference.
 
MartinWyckmans said:
Taking the sensor as point of view, the light travels towards the sensor with 1 m/s.

No, it doesn't. Velocities add differently in relativity; see here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velocity-addition_formula#Special_relativity

If you plug in c and c minus 1 m/sec in the formula, you will see that it gives the result c, which means that light moves at c relative to the sensor from the sensor's point of view.
 
Thanks both of you, I'm beginning to better understand it now!
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top