Single Variable function, local max/min is absolute max/min

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical proof that a function f(x), continuous on an interval I with a single critical point x = a, must have that point as both a local and absolute maximum or minimum. The reasoning is based on the behavior of the derivative f'(x) around the critical point and the implications of the Intermediate Value Theorem and Rolle's Theorem. If f(a) is a local maximum, then f(x) increases to f(a) from the left and decreases from f(a) to the right, confirming that no other critical points exist, thus establishing x = a as the absolute maximum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of critical points in calculus
  • Familiarity with the Intermediate Value Theorem
  • Knowledge of Rolle's Theorem
  • Basic concepts of concavity and derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Intermediate Value Theorem in more complex functions
  • Explore applications of Rolle's Theorem in real-world scenarios
  • Learn about concavity and its role in determining local extrema
  • Investigate proof techniques in calculus, particularly proof by contradiction
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of continuous functions and their critical points.

calorimetry
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a function of one variable, f(x), which is continuous on an interval I. If f has a single critical point, x = a, in I, then if that point is a local maximum (or minimum) it must also be an absolute maximum. Explain why this is.

Homework Equations


Intermediate Value Theorem
Rolle's Theorem

The Attempt at a Solution


Critical point x=a, in I, is a local maximum or minimum, thus f'(x)=0 at x=a.

The function f thus must either concave up (for a to be a local min) or concave down (for a to be a local max).

Since both cases are similar, let consider x=a is a local max.

For a local max, f'(x) is decreasing to 0 as x approaches a from the left and f'(x) is increasing negative away from 0 as x deviate away from a on the right.

Since there is only one single critical point at x=a, the concavity of the graph will not change. f(x) on the left of is an increasing function to f(a) and f(x) on the right of f is a decreasing function away from f(a). Thus x=a must also be the absolute maximum.

Is my reasoning correct? Or did I unconsciously assumed something that I shouldn't have?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you use the theorems you mentioned?

Assume there exists x_0 such that f(x_o)>f(a).

What does the intermediate value theorem tell you?
 
If f(x_o) > f(a), then according to the intermediate value theorem, there should be another value in the interval I where f(x) = f(a).

Then applying Rolle's theorem, there must be a point between x and a such that the derivative of this point is 0, hence there must be a second critical point, which contradicts with single critical point assumption.

Thanks for the help, I didn't consider proving it using proof of contradiction. Even if I did, I would not know where to begin :d. Thanks again.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K